EB-1AComputer science and AIEmployerDecided 2008Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
Jun112008_02B2203
AwardsNot metMembershipNot metFinal meritsNot met
Our summary
Technology professional petitioner claimed extraordinary ability as computer scientist based on employer awards and IEEE membership. AAO held employer awards reflect internal recognition only, not nationally recognized prizes; IEEE membership requires education, not outstanding achievement. Evidence insufficient for top-level sustained acclaim.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · IBM employer awards and stock options reflect internal company recognition, not nationally or internationally recognized prizes
- Membership · IEEE membership based on education and professional competence, not outstanding achievement required by criterion
- Final merits · No evidence petitioner distinguished himself to achieve sustained national or international acclaim at top level
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Awards | Not met | IBM employer awards and stock options reflect internal company recognition, not nationally or internationally recognized prizes |
 Membership | Not met | IEEE membership based on education and professional competence, not outstanding achievement required by criterion |
 Final merits | Not met | No evidence petitioner distinguished himself to achieve sustained national or international acclaim at top level |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.