Outcome: Dismissed
Jun242009_01B2203
Our summary
Cellist self-petitioner sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Service center denied citing insufficient sustained acclaim. On appeal, petitioner submitted recommendation letters but failed to identify specific errors or provide new documentation. AAO summarily dismissed appeal for failure to identify erroneous conclusions.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
Every criterion in the table was found met.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; appeal summarily dismissed for failure to identify error | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; appeal summarily dismissed for failure to identify error | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; appeal summarily dismissed for failure to identify error | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; appeal summarily dismissed for failure to identify error | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; appeal summarily dismissed for failure to identify error | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; appeal summarily dismissed for failure to identify error | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; appeal summarily dismissed for failure to identify error | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; appeal summarily dismissed for failure to identify error | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; appeal summarily dismissed for failure to identify error | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; appeal summarily dismissed for failure to identify error | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Not reached due to summary dismissal |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
