Outcome: Dismissed
MAR032021_04B2203
Our summary
Industrial engineer sought EB-1A classification. Met four evidentiary criteria but AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner had not demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim or achieved ranking among small percentage at top of field; appeared early in career.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Awards · AAO agreed petitioner met prizes or awards criterion
- Exhibitions · AAO found petitioner satisfied display at artistic exhibitions criterion
- Leading or critical role · AAO concluded petitioner satisfied leading or critical role criterion
- Published material · AAO determined petitioner satisfied published material criterion
What was missing
- Original contributions · Letters lacked detail and corroborating documentation; no demonstrated impact on field
- Final merits · Petitioner appeared in beginning stages of career; lacked sustained acclaim and extensive recognition at top of field
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | AAO agreed petitioner met prizes or awards criterion | |
| Met | AAO found petitioner satisfied display at artistic exhibitions criterion | |
| Met | AAO concluded petitioner satisfied leading or critical role criterion | |
| Met | AAO determined petitioner satisfied published material criterion | |
| Not met | Letters lacked detail and corroborating documentation; no demonstrated impact on field | |
| Not met | Petitioner appeared in beginning stages of career; lacked sustained acclaim and extensive recognition at top of field |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
