EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIIndividualDecided March 2025Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
MAR052025_01B5203
Merit and national importanceMetWell positionedMetBalance favors a waiverNot met
Our summary
Computer vision and AI researcher sought EB-2 national interest waiver. AAO found proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance, and applicant well positioned to advance it via advanced degree and publication record. However, waiver not warranted: while work involves critical emerging technology, evidence did not show national interest sufficiently urgent to justify forgoing labor certification process.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Merit and national importance · Computer vision and AI research has national and global implications; high-ranking conference proceedings and journal publications; scientist letters attesting to broad implications
- Well positioned · Advanced degree in relevant field; demonstrated record of success and publication in peer-reviewed venues; evidence supports positioning to advance proposed endeavor
What was missing
- Balance favors a waiver · No evidence urgency sufficiently warrants bypassing labor certification; letters praise work but do not show national interest so urgent process cannot wait
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Merit and national importance | Met | Computer vision and AI research has national and global implications; high-ranking conference proceedings and journal publications; scientist letters attesting to broad implications |
 Well positioned | Met | Advanced degree in relevant field; demonstrated record of success and publication in peer-reviewed venues; evidence supports positioning to advance proposed endeavor |
 Balance favors a waiver | Not met | No evidence urgency sufficiently warrants bypassing labor certification; letters praise work but do not show national interest so urgent process cannot wait |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.