Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1ASports and athleticsIndividualDecided March 2022Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

MAR072022_01B2203

AwardsNot metLeading or critical roleNot metMembershipNot metJudgingClaimed, not analyzedOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedPublished materialClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Soccer athlete and youth coach seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Claimed one major award and satisfaction of at least three evidentiary criteria. AAO held coaching certificates are not major internationally recognized awards and evidence does not establish three criteria met. Record lacks extensive documentation of sustained national or international acclaim required for this classification.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Awards · Coaching certificates from FA and UEFA are completion credentials, not major internationally recognized awards.
  • Leading or critical role · Evidence of significance does not establish sustained national or international acclaim or career of acclaimed work.
  • Membership · No evidence of membership requiring outstanding achievements as judged by recognized experts.
  • Final merits · Record lacks extensive documentation required to demonstrate sustained acclaim and placement among small percentage at field top.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsNot metCoaching certificates from FA and UEFA are completion credentials, not major internationally recognized awards.
Leading or critical roleNot metEvidence of significance does not establish sustained national or international acclaim or career of acclaimed work.
MembershipNot metNo evidence of membership requiring outstanding achievements as judged by recognized experts.
JudgingClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed in decision.
Original contributionsClaimed, not analyzedPetitioner did not renew this claim on appeal.
Published materialClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed in decision.
Scholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed in decision.
Final meritsNot metRecord lacks extensive documentation required to demonstrate sustained acclaim and placement among small percentage at field top.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.