Petitioner sought NIW as individual of exceptional ability. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner satisfied only two of six exceptional ability evidentiary criteria (advanced degree and work experience); petitioner did not challenge remaining criteria or provide final merits evidence, so NIW analysis was not reached.

AI researcher sought EB-2 NIW classification claiming exceptional ability. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner met only two of three required criteria for exceptional ability: official academic record and professional association membership, but not recognition for achievements and significant contributions in AI field.

Electronic engineering technician claimed exceptional ability and national interest waiver. AAO held petitioner established no exceptional ability criteria and failed to meet minimum three-criterion threshold for EB-2, making national interest waiver analysis unnecessary.

Health and safety specialist sought EB-2 exceptional ability and NIW based on proposed safety app development. Service Center found exceptional ability met three criteria but no degree of expertise significantly above field. AAO held proposed endeavor lacks national importance: app benefits only petitioner's employer and clients, not broader industry or public; field importance does not equal endeavor importance.