Outcome: Dismissed
MAR172020_01B2203
Our summary
A 3D artist and animator in the Philippines sought extraordinary ability classification. He claimed all ten criteria but met only two (judging and high salary). The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding insufficient evidence of the sustained national or international acclaim and career of acclaimed work required for extraordinary ability.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- High salary · Director found petitioner met high salary criterion; AAO agreed
- Judging · Asked to judge thesis evaluations for animation department graduating class
What was missing
- Awards · No major internationally recognized award; company award not shown to be recognized outside employer
- Membership · 3D Mentors Group membership not shown to require outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts
- Published material · Music video directed does not constitute published material about petitioner relating to his work
- Final merits · Insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim at top of field
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Director found petitioner met high salary criterion; AAO agreed | |
| Met | Asked to judge thesis evaluations for animation department graduating class | |
| Not met | No major internationally recognized award; company award not shown to be recognized outside employer | |
| Not met | 3D Mentors Group membership not shown to require outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts | |
| Not met | Music video directed does not constitute published material about petitioner relating to his work | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed | |
| Not met | Insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim at top of field |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
