Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-2 NIWEnergy and climateIndividualDecided March 2025Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

MAR202025_04B5203

Merit and national importanceNot metWell positionedNot metBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

Climate economics researcher proposed research on carbon cap-and-trade and green jobs. AAO held the proposed endeavor lacks national importance because petitioner failed to show how specific research would impact U.S. policy or economy; relying on field importance and past accomplishments insufficient.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Merit and national importance · Petitioner failed to establish national importance of specific carbon market research; field importance alone insufficient.
  • Well positioned · No evidence of research plan, institutional interest, or job offer; claims of assistant professorship unsubstantiated.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Merit and national importanceNot metPetitioner failed to establish national importance of specific carbon market research; field importance alone insufficient.
Well positionedNot metNo evidence of research plan, institutional interest, or job offer; claims of assistant professorship unsubstantiated.
Balance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussedNot reached because first and second prongs failed; balance analysis unnecessary.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.