Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1ABiotech and pharmaEmployerDecided March 2020Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

MAR232020_01B2203

JudgingMetPublished materialMetScholarly articlesMetFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

A chemistry, manufacturing, and controls regulatory affairs researcher met three evidentiary criteria (published material, judging, scholarly articles). However, on final merits the AAO found insufficient evidence of sustained national acclaim or that she ranked among the very top of her field. Limited press coverage and peer review activities did not demonstrate differentiation from peers. Appeal dismissed.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Judging · Served as peer reviewer for articles in professional journals
  • Published material · Two media articles about beneficiary published, though limited in scope
  • Scholarly articles · Published articles in professional journals; book chapters with global circulation

What was missing

  • Final merits · Two press articles insufficient for sustained acclaim; peer review and publication rate not differentiated from peers

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
JudgingMetServed as peer reviewer for articles in professional journals
Published materialMetTwo media articles about beneficiary published, though limited in scope
Scholarly articlesMetPublished articles in professional journals; book chapters with global circulation
Final meritsNot metTwo press articles insufficient for sustained acclaim; peer review and publication rate not differentiated from peers

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.