Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1ASports and athleticsIndividualDecided May 2024Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

MAY062024_02B2203

AwardsNot metCommercial successClaimed, not analyzedExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedHigh salaryClaimed, not analyzedJudgingClaimed, not analyzedLeading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedMembershipClaimed, not analyzedOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedPublished materialClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Brazilian jiu-jitsu athlete and coach seeks EB-1A. Claims include competition awards and association membership. AAO found competition medals lack national or international recognition and insufficient media coverage; membership claim not adequately established; does not meet three-criterion threshold or demonstrate extraordinary ability.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Awards · BJJ competition medals not major internationally recognized prizes; insufficient media coverage for national or international recognition
  • Final merits · Record lacks evidence of sustained national or international acclaim or small percentage at top of field

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsNot metBJJ competition medals not major internationally recognized prizes; insufficient media coverage for national or international recognition
Commercial successClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
ExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
High salaryClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
JudgingClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
Leading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
MembershipClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
Original contributionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
Published materialClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
Scholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
Final meritsNot metRecord lacks evidence of sustained national or international acclaim or small percentage at top of field

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.