Outcome: Dismissed
MAY142026_01B2203
Our summary
A digital marketing specialist sought extraordinary ability classification. The service center found two criteria met; on appeal the petitioner claimed four more. The AAO found the threshold of three criteria satisfied but dismissed the appeal because the evidence did not show sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Awards · Appeal analysis found the awards criterion satisfied, withdrawing the service center's contrary finding.
- Judging · Service center's finding stood; a single judging event was weighed in the final merits step.
- Published material · Service center had found it met; the decision accepted this and weighed the material in final merits.
What was missing
- Final merits · Evidence as a whole did not show sustained acclaim or a place among the small top percentage.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Appeal analysis found the awards criterion satisfied, withdrawing the service center's contrary finding. | |
| Met | Service center's finding stood; a single judging event was weighed in the final merits step. | |
| Met | Service center had found it met; the decision accepted this and weighed the material in final merits. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed because the required number of criteria was already satisfied. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed because the required number of criteria was already satisfied. | |
| Not met | Evidence as a whole did not show sustained acclaim or a place among the small top percentage. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
