Outcome: Dismissed
MAY192022_02B2203
Our summary
Sustainable development professional sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Claimed five criteria but established none. Did not prove receipt of recognized awards, published material about his work, or display at artistic venues. AAO found no sustained national or international acclaim or evidence of rising to very top of field, dismissing appeal.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Petitioner failed to establish receipt of nationally or internationally recognized awards
- Exhibitions · Building on city outskirts does not constitute display at artistic exhibition or showcase
- Published material · Evidence did not qualify as published material about petitioner relating to field work
- Final merits · Record does not establish sustained national or international acclaim required
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Petitioner failed to establish receipt of nationally or internationally recognized awards | |
| Not met | Building on city outskirts does not constitute display at artistic exhibition or showcase | |
| Not met | Evidence did not qualify as published material about petitioner relating to field work | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; petitioner failed three initial criteria | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; petitioner failed three initial criteria | |
| Not met | Record does not establish sustained national or international acclaim required |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
