Outcome: Dismissed
MAY312022_01B2203
Our summary
Musical director claiming extraordinary ability under EB-1A. Petitioner claimed six criteria and a major international award. AAO found the award not established as major or internationally recognized, abandoned on appeal. None of the six claimed evidentiary criteria were satisfied. Appeal dismissed.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Award not established as major, internationally recognized; abandoned on appeal
- Judging · Claimed but decision indicates petitioner did not satisfy criterion
- Membership · Claimed but decision indicates petitioner did not satisfy criterion
- Original contributions · Claimed but decision indicates petitioner did not satisfy criterion
- Published material · Claimed but decision indicates petitioner did not satisfy criterion
- Scholarly articles · Claimed but decision indicates petitioner did not satisfy criterion
- Final merits · Record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or top tier status
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Award not established as major, internationally recognized; abandoned on appeal | |
| Not met | Claimed but decision indicates petitioner did not satisfy criterion | |
| Not met | Claimed but decision indicates petitioner did not satisfy criterion | |
| Not met | Claimed but decision indicates petitioner did not satisfy criterion | |
| Not met | Claimed but decision indicates petitioner did not satisfy criterion | |
| Not met | Claimed but decision indicates petitioner did not satisfy criterion | |
| Not met | Record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or top tier status |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
