Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AOtherIndividualDecided 2005Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

NOV022005_10B2203

AwardsClaimed, not analyzedCommercial successClaimed, not analyzedExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedHigh salaryClaimed, not analyzedJudgingClaimed, not analyzedLeading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedMembershipClaimed, not analyzedOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedPublished materialClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

Professional in unspecified field claimed extraordinary ability with recognized reputation. Petitioner submitted no brief, arguments, or additional evidence on appeal and declined separate submission. AAO summarily dismissed for failure to identify erroneous conclusions or present substantive arguments.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

Every criterion in the table was found met.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; no evidence or arguments addressed regulatory criteria
Commercial successClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; no evidence or arguments addressed regulatory criteria
ExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; no evidence or arguments addressed regulatory criteria
High salaryClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; no evidence or arguments addressed regulatory criteria
JudgingClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; no evidence or arguments addressed regulatory criteria
Leading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; no evidence or arguments addressed regulatory criteria
MembershipClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; no evidence or arguments addressed regulatory criteria
Original contributionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; no evidence or arguments addressed regulatory criteria
Published materialClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; no evidence or arguments addressed regulatory criteria
Scholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; no evidence or arguments addressed regulatory criteria
Final meritsNot reached / not discussedNot analyzed; petitioner submitted only conclusory statement without substantive evidence or legal arguments

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.