Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AFilm, music, performing artsIndividualDecided November 2023Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

NOV162023_02B2203

ExhibitionsMetAwardsNot metMembershipNot metOriginal contributionsNot metPublished materialNot metFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Choreographer seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability classification in arts. Petitioner submitted evidence of exhibitions and claimed six additional criteria. AAO found only exhibitions criterion met; awards, membership, published material, and original contributions not established; appeal dismissed.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Exhibitions · Director found petitioner met criterion regarding artistic exhibitions and showcases.

What was missing

  • Awards · Awards submitted do not satisfy national or international recognition for excellence in field.
  • Membership · Association membership not based on outstanding achievements; constantly increasing membership indicated.
  • Original contributions · Petitioner failed to establish original contributions of major significance in field.
  • Published material · Article primarily about flamenco, only quoted petitioner; not about petitioner or her work.
  • Final merits · Petitioner did not meet three of ten regulatory criteria; insufficient evidence for extraordinary ability determination.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
ExhibitionsMetDirector found petitioner met criterion regarding artistic exhibitions and showcases.
AwardsNot metAwards submitted do not satisfy national or international recognition for excellence in field.
MembershipNot metAssociation membership not based on outstanding achievements; constantly increasing membership indicated.
Original contributionsNot metPetitioner failed to establish original contributions of major significance in field.
Published materialNot metArticle primarily about flamenco, only quoted petitioner; not about petitioner or her work.
Final meritsNot metPetitioner did not meet three of ten regulatory criteria; insufficient evidence for extraordinary ability determination.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.