Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-2 NIWLaw, policy, social scienceIndividualDecided November 2023Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

NOV212023_01B5203

Merit and national importanceNot metWell positionedNot reached / not discussedBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

Lawyer with advanced degree sought NIW for EB-2 classification. Petitioner proposed using legal expertise to improve operations and profitability. AAO dismissed because working in an important field is insufficient; proposed endeavor lacked specificity and evidence of national or global implications within legal field.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Merit and national importance · Lawyer's general legal services lacked specific proposed endeavor with national implications; past achievements did not demonstrate prospective impact on field.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Merit and national importanceNot metLawyer's general legal services lacked specific proposed endeavor with national implications; past achievements did not demonstrate prospective impact on field.
Well positionedNot reached / not discussedNot reached because first prong failed; issue reserved.
Balance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussedNot reached because first prong failed; issue reserved.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.