Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1ABusiness and managementIndividualDecided November 2020Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

NOV272020_01B2203

Leading or critical roleMetPublished materialMetHigh salaryNot metFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Business executive and luxury furniture company co-founder self-petitioner claimed three criteria. AAO found two criteria met but concluded aggregate evidence insufficient to demonstrate sustained acclaim or extraordinary ability required for EB-1A classification.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Leading or critical role · AAO withdrew Director's rejection and found sufficient evidence of distinguished reputation for luxury furniture company.
  • Published material · Articles in Architectural Digest and industry publications sufficiently demonstrate criterion.

What was missing

  • High salary · Base salary of $195,000 exceeds average but does not meet high wage threshold for comparable occupations.
  • Final merits · Record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or status among very top percentage of field.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Leading or critical roleMetAAO withdrew Director's rejection and found sufficient evidence of distinguished reputation for luxury furniture company.
Published materialMetArticles in Architectural Digest and industry publications sufficiently demonstrate criterion.
High salaryNot metBase salary of $195,000 exceeds average but does not meet high wage threshold for comparable occupations.
Final meritsNot metRecord does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or status among very top percentage of field.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.