Outcome: Dismissed
NOV272020_01B2203
Our summary
Business executive and luxury furniture company co-founder self-petitioner claimed three criteria. AAO found two criteria met but concluded aggregate evidence insufficient to demonstrate sustained acclaim or extraordinary ability required for EB-1A classification.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Leading or critical role · AAO withdrew Director's rejection and found sufficient evidence of distinguished reputation for luxury furniture company.
- Published material · Articles in Architectural Digest and industry publications sufficiently demonstrate criterion.
What was missing
- High salary · Base salary of $195,000 exceeds average but does not meet high wage threshold for comparable occupations.
- Final merits · Record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or status among very top percentage of field.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | AAO withdrew Director's rejection and found sufficient evidence of distinguished reputation for luxury furniture company. | |
| Met | Articles in Architectural Digest and industry publications sufficiently demonstrate criterion. | |
| Not met | Base salary of $195,000 exceeds average but does not meet high wage threshold for comparable occupations. | |
| Not met | Record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or status among very top percentage of field. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
