Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AFilm, music, performing artsIndividualDecided 2019Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

OCT012019_02B2203

AwardsNot metMembershipNot metPublished materialNot metLeading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

A singer in bands claims extraordinary ability in music. She alleged six criteria including awards, membership, published material, and leading role. The AAO found she met none of the required minimum three criteria. Evidence of a gold record award, band membership, and performance video did not satisfy regulatory requirements for documentation, recognition level, or publication standards.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Awards · Gold Record Award does not qualify as nationally or internationally recognized prize for excellence
  • Membership · Employment as contract artist does not constitute membership requiring judged outstanding achievements
  • Published material · No published material about petitioner in professional or major trade publications with required title, date, author
  • Final merits · No sustained national or international acclaim demonstrated; not among small percentage at top of field

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsNot metGold Record Award does not qualify as nationally or internationally recognized prize for excellence
MembershipNot metEmployment as contract artist does not constitute membership requiring judged outstanding achievements
Published materialNot metNo published material about petitioner in professional or major trade publications with required title, date, author
Leading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; decision notes it as separate criterion not considered
Final meritsNot metNo sustained national or international acclaim demonstrated; not among small percentage at top of field

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.