Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AFilm, music, performing artsIndividualDecided October 2023Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

OCT122023_01B2203

AwardsNot metPublished materialNot metCommercial successClaimed, not analyzedMembershipClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot reached / not discussed

Our summary

A disc jockey and sound producer sought extraordinary ability classification in the arts, claiming a number of regulatory criteria. The AAO treated the field as DJ and sound production, found the evidence on awards and published material insufficient, and held that three criteria were not satisfied, so it dismissed the appeal.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Awards · Competition win not shown to be a prize for excellence in the field or nationally or internationally recognized.
  • Published material · Evidence did not satisfy the requirements for published material about the petitioner in qualifying media.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
AwardsNot metCompetition win not shown to be a prize for excellence in the field or nationally or internationally recognized.
Published materialNot metEvidence did not satisfy the requirements for published material about the petitioner in qualifying media.
Commercial successClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; Director's adverse finding was not contested on appeal, so issue treated as waived.
MembershipClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; Director's adverse finding was not contested on appeal, so issue treated as waived.
Scholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; Director's adverse finding was not contested on appeal, so issue treated as waived.
Final meritsNot reached / not discussedNot conducted because three criteria were not met; the record in aggregate was noted as insufficient.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.