Outcome: Dismissed
OCT292024_02B2203
Our summary
A pole fitness performer claimed extraordinary ability under EB-1A, meeting awards criterion initially but failing at final merits. The AAO withdrew the awards finding, determining competitions lacked national recognition and that the performer failed to demonstrate sustained acclaim or placement among the very top in her field.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Competitions titled National lack evidence of national or international recognition; awards not from well-known institutions.
- Final merits · Record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or place at top of field.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Competitions titled National lack evidence of national or international recognition; awards not from well-known institutions. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Criterion not claimed or analyzed in decision. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Criterion not claimed or analyzed in decision. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Criterion not claimed or analyzed in decision. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Criterion not claimed or analyzed in decision. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Criterion not claimed or analyzed in decision. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Criterion not claimed or analyzed in decision. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Criterion not claimed or analyzed in decision. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Criterion not claimed or analyzed in decision. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Criterion not claimed or analyzed in decision. | |
| Not met | Record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or place at top of field. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
