EB-2 NIWLaw, policy, social scienceIndividualDecided September 2023Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed
SEP082023_02B5203
Merit and national importanceNot metWell positionedNot reached / not discussedBalance favors a waiverNot reached / not discussed
Our summary
A public policy consultant proposed independent consulting on international development and U.S. firm partnerships in developing countries. The AAO held her endeavor lacks national importance; while work has substantial merit, it does not extend beyond her consulting clientele to impact the field or U.S. economy at a national level.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Merit and national importance · Public policy and international development consulting lacks national importance; does not extend beyond clientele to impact field broadly; no substantial U.S. economic benefit shown.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
 Merit and national importance | Not met | Public policy and international development consulting lacks national importance; does not extend beyond clientele to impact field broadly; no substantial U.S. economic benefit shown. |
 Well positioned | Not reached / not discussed | Not reached because first prong failed; decision reserves analysis of third prong. |
 Balance favors a waiver | Not reached / not discussed | Not reached because first prong failed; decision reserves analysis of third prong. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.