A business development manager sought EB-2 classification as an advanced degree professional or exceptional ability individual, plus a national interest waiver. After a combined motion to reopen and reconsider was dismissed, the appeal was dismissed too, because the motion offered no new facts or legal error. The waiver issue was reserved and not decided.

Supply chain manager sought EB-2 with NIW. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner lacks advanced degree and failed to show national importance of proposed endeavor in cell tower maintenance industry, focusing on field importance rather than specific endeavor impact.

A geologist sought EB-2 classification as an individual of exceptional ability together with a national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner met only some of the required exceptional ability criteria. The waiver was not reached under the Dhanasar framework, so the decision is not a substantive NIW ruling.

Semiconductor equipment engineer sought NIW claiming to operate and maintain semiconductor manufacturing facilities. AAO dismissed because the proposed endeavor lacked sufficient specificity and detail; showing work in an important field alone does not establish national importance of the specific endeavor.