Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AArts, design, architectureIndividualDecided September 2022Sustained

Outcome: Sustained

SEP192022_01B2203

ExhibitionsMetJudgingMetPublished materialMetLeading or critical roleNot metMembershipNot metOriginal contributionsNot metAwardsClaimed, not analyzedHigh salaryClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsMet

Our summary

Tattoo artist and painter claimed seven criteria; Director found three threshold criteria met. AAO sustained appeal, finding at final merits that petitioner achieved sustained national or international acclaim through substantial media presence, large social media following, and documented professional recognition as widely respected artist.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Exhibitions · Director found criterion met; not disturbed on appeal
  • Judging · Director found criterion met; invited to judge at national Tattoo Arts Convention; not disturbed on appeal
  • Published material · Director found criterion met; featured in articles listing best tattoo artists; not disturbed on appeal
  • Final merits · Petitioner achieved sustained national or international acclaim as widely respected tattoo artist with substantial social media following and documented professional recognition

What was missing

  • Leading or critical role · Petitioner reasserted on appeal but AAO agreed with Director's rejection
  • Membership · Director and AAO rejected; petitioner reasserted on appeal without success
  • Original contributions · Petitioner reasserted on appeal but AAO agreed with Director's rejection

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
ExhibitionsMetDirector found criterion met; not disturbed on appeal
JudgingMetDirector found criterion met; invited to judge at national Tattoo Arts Convention; not disturbed on appeal
Published materialMetDirector found criterion met; featured in articles listing best tattoo artists; not disturbed on appeal
Leading or critical roleNot metPetitioner reasserted on appeal but AAO agreed with Director's rejection
MembershipNot metDirector and AAO rejected; petitioner reasserted on appeal without success
Original contributionsNot metPetitioner reasserted on appeal but AAO agreed with Director's rejection
AwardsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not reached; threshold criteria already satisfied
High salaryClaimed, not analyzedNot claimed or analyzed
Scholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedNot claimed or analyzed
Final meritsMetPetitioner achieved sustained national or international acclaim as widely respected tattoo artist with substantial social media following and documented professional recognition

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.