Outcome: Dismissed
SEP272023_01B2203
Our summary
Professional surfer claims extraordinary ability in competitive surfing. Petitioner established two initial criteria but not the required three minimum. Awards criterion failed; team bronze medal did not constitute individual award. Membership criterion failed; no evidence organizations required outstanding achievements by recognized experts. AAO found insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim to meet extraordinary ability standard.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Exhibitions · Director found criterion satisfied; petitioner did not dispute on appeal
- Published material · Director found criterion satisfied; petitioner did not dispute on appeal
What was missing
- Awards · Bronze medal from team participation did not constitute individual award meeting plain language requirement
- Membership · No evidence that membership in surfing organizations required outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts
- Final merits · Petitioner did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or place among small percentage at top
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Director found criterion satisfied; petitioner did not dispute on appeal | |
| Met | Director found criterion satisfied; petitioner did not dispute on appeal | |
| Not met | Bronze medal from team participation did not constitute individual award meeting plain language requirement | |
| Not met | No evidence that membership in surfing organizations required outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts | |
| Not met | Petitioner did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or place among small percentage at top |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
