Outcome: Dismissed
SEP302024_01B2203
Our summary
A periodontist sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. She met three initial criteria: judging, scholarly articles, and high salary. However, the AAO found her research lacked sustained acclaim over time, media coverage was dated, and honors were insufficient to demonstrate she belonged among the very top in her field.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- High salary · Director found petitioner met high salary criterion; AAO did not disturb this finding.
- Judging · Director found petitioner met judging criterion; AAO did not disturb this finding.
- Scholarly articles · Director found petitioner met authorship of scholarly articles criterion; AAO did not disturb.
What was missing
- Final merits · AAO found no sustained national or international acclaim and not among small percentage at top.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Director found petitioner met high salary criterion; AAO did not disturb this finding. | |
| Met | Director found petitioner met judging criterion; AAO did not disturb this finding. | |
| Met | Director found petitioner met authorship of scholarly articles criterion; AAO did not disturb. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed as separate criterion; poster competition finalist mentioned in merits analysis. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed separately; media articles discussed in final merits phase. | |
| Not met | AAO found no sustained national or international acclaim and not among small percentage at top. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
