Published AAO appeal decisions

A semiconductor technology researcher with a Ph.D. sought NIW under Dhanasar. USCIS denied, finding advanced degree qualification but failing all three Dhanasar prongs. AAO remanded, finding USCIS did not meaningfully evaluate the record or address petitioner's evidence.

A technology corporation sponsored an engineer for EB-2 with NIW to advance wireless RF digital module design. The petitioner failed to address the third Dhanasar prong (balance favoring waiver) including labor certification impracticality; the appeal arguments were limited and did not meaningfully contest the service center's denial. The appeal was dismissed as the third prong is dispositive.

AI engineer self-petitioner sought NIW based on broad plans to advance AI and exponential technologies for healthcare and general use. AAO found no specific proposed endeavor: petitioner discussed general intentions without particularizing data-driven tools, efficiency gains, or LLM inference work. Appeal dismissed; favorable prong determinations withdrawn without specific endeavor.

A machine learning engineer with a master's degree sought EB-2 NIW for research into autonomous driving and robotics systems. The AAO confirmed he met the advanced degree requirement and that his endeavor had substantial merit, but rejected the petition because his proposed research lacked sufficient evidence of national importance under Dhanasar's first prong.

A computer scientist with master's degree sought an EB-2 national interest waiver for research in network architecture for data centers. The AAO dismissed, finding the petitioner established substantial merit but failed to prove national importance of the specific proposed endeavor despite industry relevance.

Research and development manager in software engineering from China working on machine learning for insurance industry risk assessment. Met first Dhanasar prong on substantial merit and national importance but failed second prong; citations and education alone insufficient to demonstrate well-positioned status. Appeal dismissed.

An employer petitioned for an EB-2 national interest waiver for a machine learning engineer developing deep learning and NLP models. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner established substantial merit but failed to demonstrate that the specific proposed endeavor had national importance despite evidence of AI field importance.

A senior SoC researcher sought EB-2 NIW under Dhanasar. The AAO found substantial merit and national importance of his hardware security research but held he failed to show he is well-positioned to advance it, lacking contemporaneous evidence of impact or specific advancement plan.

Computer scientist with advanced degree proposed developing computer vision and large language models for drug discovery. AAO found SCOPS failed to adequately analyze whether endeavor has substantial merit and national importance, contained contradictory statements on second prong, and insufficiently analyzed third prong. Decision withdrawn and remanded.

Senior machine learning engineer proposes research on foundational model disentanglement and interpretability. AAO found the endeavor has substantial merit and national importance but rejected the petition because the petitioner failed to demonstrate she is well-positioned to advance it through sufficient record of success or influence in the field.

Senior software engineer with PhD in computer science proposes distributed query optimization research. AAO found the research endeavor meritorious but distinguished between proposed independent research and employer-specific benefits, finding the latter lacks national importance. Petition dismissed because petitioner failed second prong.

AI manufacturer petitioned for beneficiary's EB-2 national interest waiver. Beneficiary qualified for underlying EB-2 but failed NIW Dhanasar first prong; proposed work lacked demonstrated national importance and broader implications beyond company and clients.

Computer scientist with master's degree in engineering proposed advancing AI research in deep learning for data analysis and virtual assistants. AAO found endeavor has substantial merit and national importance but petitioner is not well positioned to advance it due to insufficient record of success and impact. Appeal dismissed on second prong failure.

Computer scientist employed as engineering associate proposed developing proprietary software for AI safety and trust. AAO affirmed denial because proposed work lacked national importance, benefiting only the specific employer despite national footprint, even though petitioner was well positioned.

Senior security researcher seeks NIW for cybersecurity innovations. AAO dismissed finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance; work benefits only specific employers and clients without broader field or national security implications.

A telecommunications researcher with doctorate proposed advancing machine learning and deep learning research under EB-2 national interest waiver. AAO found her endeavor met national importance but dismissed appeal because publications, nominal peer reliance, and limited demonstrated funding responsibility failed to show she was well positioned to advance it.

A research scientist with a PhD in computer science sought EB-2 NIW for AI research in multimodal machine learning. SCOPS denied NIW but approved advanced degree qualification. The AAO reversed, finding all three Dhanasar prongs met: substantial merit and national importance in AI, petitioner well-positioned, and waiver balances beneficially for the United States.

Senior cloud security architect petitioned for EB-2 NIW by technology company. Petitioner claimed research on AI-driven cybersecurity architectures. AAO found substantial merit but insufficient specificity and no demonstrated national importance beyond employer and clients. Appeal dismissed.

An employer petitions for software engineer beneficiary for EB-2 NIW classification. SCOPS erred by analyzing prior work rather than proposed endeavor, and failed to apply STEM field guidance. AAO withdrew SCOPS decision and remanded for proper analysis of all three Dhanasar prongs with appropriate consideration of software engineering innovation.

Senior engineer in AI research seeking NIW under Dhanasar framework for continued research on safe, autonomous AI systems. Service center's denial lacked complete analysis of evidence, made contradictory statements, and failed to address all arguments. Remanded for proper application of all three Dhanasar prongs with complete evidentiary analysis.

IT professional with advanced degree sought NIW under EB-2 for STEM research. AAO found first two Dhanasar prongs met but dismissed because petitioner demonstrated ability to secure employment and failed to establish that national interest was urgent enough to waive labor certification requirement.

Software engineer with Ph.D. in electrical and computer engineering sought EB-2 national interest waiver. Director found first prong met but third prong failed. AAO affirmed first prong for research only but withdrew finding on second prong. Petitioner failed third prong: work primarily benefits employer, no evidence labor certification inappropriate, insufficient urgency. Dismissed.

An employer petitioned for EB-2 national interest waiver for a software engineer specializing in thermal management for electric vehicles. The AAO dismissed, finding the specific proposed work lacked evidence of broader industry or field implications rising to national importance, despite the importance of electric vehicle development and sustainability goals generally.

Postdoctoral researcher in wireless communications and networking seeking EB-2 NIW. SCOPS denied; first appeal found substantial merit and positioning but denied waiver on balancing prong. Motion to reconsider granted after AAO recognized Ph.D. in STEM field working on critical emerging technology as strong positive factor for national benefit under revised Dhanasar analysis.

An automation and optimization supervisor sought EB-2 classification with NIW under Dhanasar. The AAO found he qualified as advanced degree professional but rejected the NIW, determining his proposed SAP project work lacks national importance beyond his employer and that waiving the job offer requirement would not benefit the United States.