AAO Decisions Explorer · Free
Published AAO appeal decisions
Search the decisions the Administrative Appeals Office has published, narrow them by visa, criterion, field and year, and read our summary of each one with a link to the official PDF.

Decisions in the library
6,586
6,586 classified
Visa types
3
Years covered
2005-2026
Latest decision
Aug 31, 2026
Filters
11 decisions
Outcomes in these results
- Dismissed
- Remanded
- Sustained
- EB-2 NIWBiotech and pharmaJul 2026Dismissed
Bioengineer in precision medicine and drug discovery met first Dhanasar prong with substantial merit and national importance. However, lacked PhD and did not demonstrate sufficient progress, plan, or stakeholder interest required for second prong. Appeal dismissed.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBiotech and pharmaJun 2026Dismissed
Chemical engineer with five years pharmaceutical and biotechnology experience sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Proposed developing analytical methods and processes for vaccine and therapeutic manufacturing. AAO dismissed because petitioner failed to demonstrate proposed work has national importance; work appeared routine to employer without broader industry impact.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBiotech and pharmaFeb 2026Dismissed
Biotechnology researcher proposes developing genomic editing tools for disease modeling and gene therapy targeting neurodegenerative and autoimmune disorders. AAO found the endeavor has substantial merit but rejected it because the record fails to establish the proposed endeavor's prospective impact or national importance, relying instead on general industry importance.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBiotech and pharmaJun 2025Dismissed
Business development manager in pharmaceutical sector seeks EB-2 NIW. SCOPS found petitioner qualified for EB-2 and met second Dhanasar prong. AAO held first prong unmet because petitioner conflated general field importance with specific endeavor's national importance; no prospective impact directly attributable to petitioner's work.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBiotech and pharmaMay 2025Dismissed
Engineer and researcher in clinical tissue engineering and transplantation seeking EB-2 advanced degree classification and national interest waiver. AAO affirmed that petitioner qualified as advanced degree professional but dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to demonstrate being well-positioned to advance proposed endeavor; education and publications insufficient without demonstrated record of success.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBiotech and pharmaApr 2025Sustained
A pharmaceutical researcher with advanced degree seeking EB-2 classification and national interest waiver for nanotechnology drug delivery research targeting cancer and HIV. AAO sustained appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs met: endeavor advances federal priorities, petitioner well-positioned through expertise and proven success, and waiver benefits U.S. public health.
3 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBiotech and pharmaMar 2025Sustained
Biomedical engineer with advanced degree seeks EB-2 with national interest waiver to research neurodegenerative diseases. AAO sustained appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs met: research has substantial merit and national importance, petitioner well-positioned to advance it, and waiver would benefit United States.
3 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBiotech and pharmaOct 2024Sustained
Electrical engineer and medical imaging researcher with Ph.D. in ultrasound diagnostic analysis sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Claimed research has broad field implications. AAO sustained, finding all three Dhanasar prongs met: substantial merit and national importance demonstrated, well-positioned given Ph.D. and track record, and U.S. balance favored waiver.
3 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBiotech and pharmaApr 2024Sustained
A researcher in cancer therapeutics using biotechnology tools sought EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO sustained the appeal, finding the proposed research demonstrated substantial merit and national importance, the petitioner was well positioned to advance it, and on balance waiving the job offer would benefit the United States.
3 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBiotech and pharmaMar 2023Sustained
Biocompatibility material scientist with Ph.D. seeking EB-2 classification and national interest waiver. Petitioner demonstrated all three Dhanasar prongs: proposed wound care research has national importance, petitioner is well-positioned with advanced degrees and expertise, and waiver benefits U.S. interests. Appeal sustained.
3 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBiotech and pharmaJan 2016Dismissed
Doctoral candidate in medical research seeking EB-2 NIW for developing medical devices for organ preservation and hypoxia treatment. AAO found first prong met but dismissed, finding petitioner not well-positioned to advance endeavor due to lack of Ph.D. at filing and insufficient connection of prior research to proposed medical device work.
1 of 3 criteria metRead →
