Published AAO appeal decisions

Computer scientist with advanced degree sought EB-2 NIW for data warehouse and machine learning research. AAO held proposed research lacked sufficient detail and documentation to demonstrate national importance beyond employer; relied on petitioner's own statements without corroborating evidence.

A fraud data analyst with advanced degree sought EB-2 national interest waiver for work developing machine learning fraud detection models. She claimed the work addresses important fraud prevention and financial risk. The AAO dismissed, holding her employer-specific role lacks evidence of broader national implications, novel technologies for field-wide adoption, or prospective impact beyond her current position.

Research associate with master's in mechanical engineering sought EB-2 NIW to continue carbon capture and sustainable aviation fuel research. First prong met. AAO affirmed second prong failure: education strong but lacks Ph.D., plan insufficient, no documented role in obtaining funding; appeal dismissed.

Associate director in international supply chain operations seeking EB-2 national interest waiver. Service center found advanced degree qualification but denied waiver. AAO affirmed, holding that supply chain management work, despite general field importance, does not demonstrate specific national importance under Dhanasar first prong.

An industrial engineering developer of data models sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. The AAO affirmed denial because his on-the-job research lacked national importance, benefiting only his employer and customers without broader field implications; prior NSF funding does not establish national importance of new proposed endeavor.

Software engineer with master's in computer science sought EB-2 NIW for developing secure healthcare software. AAO held endeavor lacked national importance despite alignment with federal priorities, and petitioner not well-positioned without demonstrated interest from relevant parties or detailed plans.

Graduate student researcher in structural engineering sought EB-2 NIW for developing sustainable concrete materials and construction methods. AAO found proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance, but petitioner failed second prong by lacking documented plan, progress, and stakeholder interest to advance the endeavor.

A researcher with a master's degree in electrical engineering sought EB-2 NIW for research in wireless charging technology for smartphones. The AAO confirmed the advanced degree requirement and substantial merit but rejected the petition because uncorroborated expert assertions about national importance were insufficient; the technology's impact was limited to employer, licensees, and customers, not national impact.

Project engineer seeking EB-2 NIW for advanced simulation software development in mechanical engineering. AAO found proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; impact on field insufficient and not extending beyond employer to justify waiver. Appeal dismissed.

Engineering graduate student self-petitioner sought NIW for AI research using linguistics and game theory. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacked specific details and documented prospective impact required to establish national importance under Dhanasar first prong.

Information technology researcher with advanced degree sought NIW. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor has national importance but petitioner lacks relevant expertise, clear research plan, and demonstrated funding success needed to be well-positioned to advance it.

An aerospace engineer with a Ph.D. seeking EB-2 with NIW for fatigue/damage tolerance research demonstrated the first Dhanasar prong but failed the second, lacking evidence his work influenced the field or represented record of success in advancing the endeavor.

Researcher in cybersecurity sought NIW under EB-2. AAO found his proposed AI-based research had national importance but dismissed because he lacked sufficient record of success and feasible plan demonstrating he could advance it as described in academic or industrial environment.

Education and public safety specialist seeks EB-2 NIW for proposed security services business and training company. Petitioner qualifies as advanced degree professional but failed to establish national importance of endeavor or evidence of success positioning her to advance it, thus ineligible for waiver.

A telecommunications researcher with doctorate proposed advancing machine learning and deep learning research under EB-2 national interest waiver. AAO found her endeavor met national importance but dismissed appeal because publications, nominal peer reliance, and limited demonstrated funding responsibility failed to show she was well positioned to advance it.

A research scientist with a PhD in computer science sought EB-2 NIW for AI research in multimodal machine learning. SCOPS denied NIW but approved advanced degree qualification. The AAO reversed, finding all three Dhanasar prongs met: substantial merit and national importance in AI, petitioner well-positioned, and waiver balances beneficially for the United States.

Lawyer seeking EB-2 advanced degree classification and national interest waiver to establish legal consultancy for sustainable energy. Claimed substantial merit and national importance for Center for Legal Innovation in Sustainable Energy but failed to demonstrate national importance or specific improvements over existing initiatives. AAO dismissed appeal; first and third prongs not established.

Research scientist sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for developing artificial intelligence technologies. Decision found proposed endeavor lacks sufficient detail and evidence to establish prospective national importance. Appeal dismissed on first prong failure.

Senior legal advisor with advanced degree sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Service center denied without analyzing evidence against Dhanasar framework. AAO remanded because service center failed to discuss evidence, identify insufficiencies, or explain conclusions for any of the three prongs required for meaningful appellate review.

Senior cloud security architect petitioned for EB-2 NIW by technology company. Petitioner claimed research on AI-driven cybersecurity architectures. AAO found substantial merit but insufficient specificity and no demonstrated national importance beyond employer and clients. Appeal dismissed.

An employer petitions for software engineer beneficiary for EB-2 NIW classification. SCOPS erred by analyzing prior work rather than proposed endeavor, and failed to apply STEM field guidance. AAO withdrew SCOPS decision and remanded for proper analysis of all three Dhanasar prongs with appropriate consideration of software engineering innovation.

Business development manager in pharmaceutical sector seeks EB-2 NIW. SCOPS found petitioner qualified for EB-2 and met second Dhanasar prong. AAO held first prong unmet because petitioner conflated general field importance with specific endeavor's national importance; no prospective impact directly attributable to petitioner's work.

Cloud software developer with master's degree in computer engineering seeking EB-2 advanced degree professional status with national interest waiver for machine learning research. AAO reversed service center on first prong but dismissed appeal because petitioner lacks sufficient track record and advancement capability beyond educational credentials alone.

Senior engineer in AI research seeking NIW under Dhanasar framework for continued research on safe, autonomous AI systems. Service center's denial lacked complete analysis of evidence, made contradictory statements, and failed to address all arguments. Remanded for proper application of all three Dhanasar prongs with complete evidentiary analysis.

Advanced degree professional in human trafficking prevention seeking EB-2 national interest waiver. Petitioner established substantial merit but failed to demonstrate national importance of specific proposed endeavor. While human trafficking prevention is federally recognized as priority, petitioner's individual work lacks evidence of prospective national or global impact beyond immediate clients. Appeal dismissed.