Published AAO appeal decisions

IT project manager sought EB-2 advanced degree with NIW. AAO affirmed denial: petitioner qualified for EB-2 but failed first Dhanasar prong; proposed endeavor lacked national importance, benefiting only employer and clients without establishing broader economic effects or job creation.

Computer network architect seeks EB-2 exceptional ability and NIW. AAO affirmed denial, finding petitioner met only one of six exceptional ability criteria. NIW not reached on merits; first prong failed because specific endeavor lacks prospective national importance beyond company scope.

Company petitioning for NIW to employ beneficiary as cybersecurity expert. Director and AAO found beneficiary met advanced degree requirement but endeavor lacked national importance. AAO affirmed, finding work lacks sufficient broad impact despite substantial merit, similar to STEM teaching precedent.

Technical program manager in data storage sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO found petitioner met three evidentiary criteria (judging, scholarly articles, leading critical role), overcoming denial basis. Matter remanded for director to conduct final merits determination assessing sustained acclaim.

Computer user support specialist seeks NIW for EB-2. Petitioner asserted expertise and field importance; claimed endeavor to help organizations implement IT systems nationally. AAO dismissed appeal, finding no evidence the specific endeavor extends beyond client organizations to impact IT industry or economy broadly at national importance level.

Product manager with doctorate in robotics and AI sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. AAO found three criteria met (awards, scholarly articles, leading role) but final merits analysis showed achievements insufficient for sustained national/international acclaim at top of field level.