Published AAO appeal decisions

Electrical and automation engineer seeking EB-2 with NIW to work in petroleum industry. Argued national importance exceeds prior Dhanasar petitioner and challenged impact standard. AAO affirmed denial: field importance does not establish national importance of specific endeavor; petitioner does not qualify as advanced degree professional due to insufficient documented work experience.

A plastic packaging manufacturer petitioned for a beneficiary seeking EB-2 NIW classification as an advanced degree professional or individual of exceptional ability. The AAO upheld the denial, finding the beneficiary lacked five years progressive post-baccalaureate experience for advanced degree status and failed to meet at least three criteria for exceptional ability. NIW was moot.

Electrical engineer sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Initially described endeavor as continuing work in manufacturing; later added new business launch and service company plans. AAO held petitioner provided inconsistent and materially changed information about proposed endeavor; national importance not demonstrated; first prong failed.

Electrical engineering researcher employed in semiconductor development sought NIW for EB-2 classification. Petitioner claimed three Dhanasar prongs. AAO sustained appeal, finding proposed next-generation semiconductor research has national importance, petitioner is well-positioned to advance it, and waiver benefits U.S. interests.

Electrical engineer seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO affirmed denial because petitioner failed to establish EB-2 eligibility and, independently, failed the first Dhanasar prong by not demonstrating his specific proposed endeavor has national importance.