Published AAO appeal decisions

Applied mathematician with doctorate proposed algorithm optimization for medical devices. Possessed substantial merit but failed to establish national importance of specific endeavor. Evidence about medical devices industry and general STEM field importance insufficient without showing direct national impact. Appeal dismissed.

Quantum mathematics researcher sought national interest waiver as advanced degree holder. Met EB-2 advanced degree requirement but failed first Dhanasar prong. Recommendation letters lacking specificity about proposed endeavor; insufficient evidence that research has national importance beyond field prestige.

A mathematical researcher petitioned by a financial management business for EB-1A classification. Four criteria were met: judging, scholarly articles, critical role, and high salary. However, the AAO dismissed the appeal because the totality of evidence did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the very top in the field.