Published AAO appeal decisions

An employer petitions for NIW for a beneficiary working as an automotive HVAC engineer to continue developing energy-efficient electrified HVAC systems. The AAO dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish the beneficiary's specific proposed endeavor has national importance; working in an important field and industry does not establish the specific work extends beyond the employer with broader impact.

An employer sponsored a lead EV applications engineer for EB-2 NIW classification to develop electrified axles for electric and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance; work on an important product does not establish the endeavor extends beyond the employer to impact the broader industry.

An employer petitions for a mechanical engineer beneficiary seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver for hardware and audio product design. The AAO affirmed the Director's finding that the specific endeavor lacked national importance; while the field involves critical technologies, the individual's specific design tasks alone do not demonstrate broader implications.

Employer petitioned for NIW for project controls engineer managing capital improvement contracts for school districts. AAO dismissed appeal because engineer's specific work lacks national importance; role in contract administration does not advance STEM or field broadly; industry significance does not establish endeavor significance.

Automobile manufacturer petitions for advanced-degree beneficiary as global safety investigations and recalls coordinator. Claimed national importance via safety improvements and industry impact. AAO affirmed dismissal; substantial merit shown but lacks national importance; work improves employer operations without demonstrating broader automotive or safety recall industry impact.

An engineer sought EB-2 with NIW to open a consulting firm serving small/medium construction companies. The AAO dismissed, finding the proposed endeavor lacked national importance. Arguments about environmental and economic benefits were insufficient under Dhanasar framework.

A researcher in advanced manufacturing sought EB-2 with NIW. The Service Center approved the advanced degree requirement. The AAO dismissed, finding the proposed endeavor had substantial merit but lacked national importance; past research accomplishments do not establish future national-level impact.

Aircraft mechanic seeking NIW for EB-2 advanced degree or exceptional ability classification. AAO affirmed denial, finding petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance of his specific proposed endeavor of providing aviation mechanical services, conflating industry importance with endeavor-specific national impact.

A mechanical engineer sought EB-2 NIW to establish a consulting business. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner failed the first Dhanasar prong: his proposed consultancy lacked business plan detail, identified no specific clients, and did not demonstrate national importance or significant economic impact.

A mechanical engineer and researcher in additive manufacturing sought employer-sponsored EB-2 NIW for research benefiting aerospace and military industries. The AAO reversed the service center on prong one but dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to demonstrate she was well positioned to advance the endeavor through prior success or external support.

Industrial and quality engineer seeks EB-2 exceptional ability classification and NIW. AAO affirmed dismissal partly because petitioner abandoned appeal arguments regarding national importance by failing to respond to Director's analysis. Also found first Dhanasar prong unmet.

Mechanical engineer seeking national interest waiver for EB-2 exceptional ability classification. Petitioner proposed either employment or founding consulting startup. AAO found proposed endeavor lacked specific national importance; generalized industry references insufficient under Dhanasar; appeal dismissed.

Industrial instrumentation specialist sought EB-2 advanced degree classification with national interest waiver. AAO dismissed, finding proposed endeavor of providing instrumentation services to manufacturing companies lacks national importance; benefits limited to specific employer and clients without broader field or economic impact.

Aircraft mechanic and technician sought EB-2 advanced degree or exceptional ability classification with national interest waiver. AAO dismissed, finding proposed endeavor of working as aircraft interior technician lacks national importance; arguments regarding aviation industry importance do not establish specific endeavor's broader impact.

Aircraft mechanic with sixteen years experience sought national interest waiver for EB-2 as individual of exceptional ability. AAO found applicant met three regulatory criteria but failed to demonstrate expertise significantly above ordinary level. Underlying EB-2 eligibility not established. Appeal dismissed.

An engineering company sponsored a thermofluidic and bridge erosion researcher for O-1A extraordinary ability. The petitioner submitted evidence for four criteria but satisfied only scholarly articles. The AAO found the beneficiary's published work lacked demonstration of major significance; diverse skillset alone does not constitute original contributions of requisite magnitude. Appeal dismissed.

Mechatronics engineer sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Described endeavor as continued employment with multinational companies on cross-border transactions; later added business plan and service company. AAO held proposed endeavor lacked national importance; business plan materials presented new facts post-filing; letters and articles address industry, not specific endeavor impact.

Drilling engineer with advanced degree seeking national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. Petitioner claimed endeavor in oil and gas drilling had national importance. AAO affirmed Director's finding that endeavor had substantial merit but lacked evidence of national importance; general industry importance does not establish specific endeavor's national importance without prospective economic impact data.

Professional auto racing team petitioned for an engineer employed since 2016. Petitioner met three evidentiary criteria but AAO found the totality of evidence insufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or position among the very top of the field of automotive engineering.

Mechanical engineer with advanced degree seeking NIW. Proposed endeavor involved high-end engineering work in oil and gas industry. AAO found endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance. Impact limited to employer and clients without broader implications for mechanical engineering or oil and gas field. No significant U.S. employment potential shown.

Aircraft marketing company sponsoring aircraft design engineer for EB-2 national interest waiver. Beneficiary would perform engineering on passenger-to-ambulance and passenger-to-freight aircraft conversions. AAO affirmed denial, finding endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance because record does not show broader industry implications, specific employment details, or sufficient positive economic effects beyond company operations.

Mechanical engineer employed by company seeks national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. Petitioner claimed his mechanical engineering work for automotive manufacturers would have national importance. AAO dismissed appeal, finding insufficient evidence that the specific proposed endeavor has national importance or substantial economic effects, failing the first Dhanasar prong.

Mechanical engineer with Ph.D. seeking EB-2 national interest waiver. Petitioner held advanced degree but failed to establish substantial merit and national importance of proposed endeavor under Dhanasar framework. AAO dismissed because petitioner did not differentiate proposed research from past work or demonstrate prospective impact.

An employer petitioned for an engineer to receive EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The beneficiary met two of ten criteria (judging and scholarly articles). On appeal, the AAO held the beneficiary failed to meet the required three criteria threshold because contributions lacked demonstrated major significance and sustained acclaim in the field was not established.

A medical device company sponsored a mechanical R&D engineer for EB-2 exceptional ability classification. This was not a national interest waiver case, and no waiver was requested. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the labor certification and offered wage did not show the position needs a person of exceptional ability.