Published AAO appeal decisions

An aircraft technician seeks EB-2 NIW based on exceptional ability and national interest waiver. AAO found the proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance. Although the petitioner cited aviation safety and training programs, he did not demonstrate how his specific work or training would produce broad impacts or substantial economic effects at national scale.

Ph.D. in biological and agricultural engineering claimed EB-1A extraordinary ability based on judging, scholarly articles, and original contributions. AAO affirmed Service Center finding that petitioner met only judging and articles criteria. Original contributions claim rejected because citation rates and professional letters did not establish widespread field commentary on significance.

A mechanical engineer and project manager with an advanced degree proposed continuing infrastructure work in energy and oil-gas sectors. The AAO found substantial merit but rejected national importance because his work would not extend beyond clients with broader implications, and he made impermissible material changes to his endeavor.

A controls engineer sought NIW for EB-2 under Dhanasar to advance Industry 4.0 manufacturing modernization. The AAO found him not well-positioned to advance the endeavor, lacking Ph.D. credentials, demonstrated influence in the field, and evidence of interest from relevant parties beyond his employer.

An automotive company petitioned to employ a process controls engineer under EB-2 NIW, claiming the EV battery assembly work has national importance. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacks national importance under Dhanasar's first prong, as impact appears limited to employer and immediate business partners rather than industry-wide.

Mechanical engineer employed in advanced driver assistance systems sought national interest waiver. AAO held proposed endeavor lacked sufficient concrete examples of broad impact and petitioner did not establish ownership of intellectual property or impact beyond specific employer, failing the substantial merit and national importance prong.

Industrial machinery mechanic sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with national interest waiver. AAO found petitioner met only two of six criteria and lacked exceptional ability: professional identity card did not constitute recognized profession license; salary evidence insufficient; professional association membership unsubstantiated; achievement recognition undemonstrated. Appeal dismissed.

An automotive technician sought exceptional ability classification with a national interest waiver and filed a seventh combined motion after earlier dismissals. He submitted a revised business plan and argued the Dhanasar prongs. The AAO dismissed it because the motion did not address any error in the latest decision and attacked only the original denial.

Research engineer with mechanical engineering doctorate sought EB-2 NIW for HVAC&R systems research. AAO found the proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance but dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to show he is well positioned to advance it without his current employment, lacking independent funding and demonstrating field adoption.

An automotive manufacturer petitioned for EB-1A classification for a motorsports aerodynamics engineer. The petitioner claimed published material, original contributions, and high salary. The AAO found the publication not sufficiently authoritative, citations not demonstrable as significant, and wage comparisons not appropriately benchmarked, dismissing the appeal.

An industrial engineer with a doctorate in transportation engineering sought an EB-2 national interest waiver for predictive maintenance research. The AAO dismissed, finding the petitioner failed to demonstrate she was well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor despite meeting the first prong.

Materials engineer seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver for supply chain optimization initiative. Petitioner holds advanced degree but failed to establish national importance of proposed endeavor; claimed scalability and broad impacts lack specific details and independent corroborating evidence.

Mechanical engineer self-petitioner claimed five EB-1A criteria. SCOPS found only two met (judging, scholarly articles). AAO remanded because SCOPS misidentified awards, failed to explain published material issues, and confused patent citations with article citations, preventing proper evaluation of original contributions and final merits.

Senior engineering program manager with advanced degree seeks NIW for research on electromechanical systems including motor design, hybrid vehicle powertrains, and aerospace monitoring. SCOPS approved advanced degree qualification and substantial merit but denied national importance. AAO upheld dismissal, finding insufficient evidence of broader field impact or economic effects rising to national importance.

A mechanical engineer sought a national interest waiver for an EB-2 employment-based petition. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner failed to establish that the proposed thermal management research endeavor has national importance, the first Dhanasar prong required for waiver eligibility.

Industrial engineer seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver for modular oil and gas facility modernization work. Petitioner claimed national economic and environmental benefits. AAO held proposed endeavor lacked sufficient direct evidentiary tie to claimed benefits and national importance.

An industrial engineer sought EB-2 national interest waiver for manufacturing technology in recycled composites. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner established national importance of the endeavor but failed to demonstrate he was well-positioned to advance it, lacking documented record of success or demonstrated customer interest.

A mechanical engineer with advanced degree sought NIW for a robotics research endeavor while employed full-time elsewhere. The AAO affirmed dismissal because the petitioner failed to establish that the specific proposed endeavor had national importance, showing only that robotics broadly benefits the field rather than demonstrating distinct national implications.

Metal fabrication Project Procurement Manager seeks NIW for EB-2 classification. Petitioner claimed endeavor modernizes U.S. infrastructure and bridges. AAO dismissed appeal, finding endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance because impact is limited to specific clients and projects, not the broader metal fabrication or construction industry.

An employer petitioned for a quality assurance manager in aerospace manufacturing, seeking EB-2 advanced degree classification with a national interest waiver. The service center denied it. The AAO dismissed the appeal, holding the endeavor lacked national importance because its impact was confined to the employer and economic benefits were too attenuated, so other prongs were not reached.

Aerospace researcher claimed five evidentiary criteria for extraordinary ability. AAO found she met fewer than three criteria required and lacked sustained national or international acclaim at the top of her field, dismissing the appeal.

Automotive engineer sought EB-2 NIW for autonomous vehicle research and development. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner provided only broad, general claims without a specific, detailed proposed endeavor required under Dhanasar framework.

Mechanical engineer from Brazil proposing industrial maintenance services, consulting, and workforce training business seeking EB-2 NIW. AAO found petitioner lacked five years progressive experience for advanced degree professional basis. On merits, proposed endeavor lacks sufficient documentary evidence of national importance; workforce shortage alone insufficient; no showing of significant employment or regional economic benefit.

A global vehicle manufacturer petitioned for a vice president of vehicle engineering to receive extraordinary ability classification. The AAO found the beneficiary did not meet the awards, membership, or high salary criteria and failed the final merits determination, concluding insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim.

An employer petitioned for a national interest waiver for an EB-2 advanced degree professional working on sustainable semiconductor lithography systems. The AAO agreed with SCOPS that while the beneficiary's work has substantial merit, the petitioner failed to demonstrate its national importance; benefits limited to specific employer and field importance alone do not satisfy the first Dhanasar prong.