Published AAO appeal decisions

Weapons development specialist from Ukraine sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO dismissed, finding petitioner met at least three criteria but failed final merits determination, showing only government-level recognition without demonstrating sustained national or international acclaim.

A cosmetologist seeks EB-2 NIW classification. The director found exceptional ability and that petitioner was well-positioned to advance the endeavor. The AAO affirmed lack of national importance: the business plan showed no substantial positive economic effects in New York or industry-wide impact on cosmetology, dismissing the appeal.

Employer petitions for beneficiary seeking EB-2 NIW; beneficiary proposed to work as company president providing moving services to domestic violence victims. AAO affirmed dismissal of motion to reopen; proposed endeavor lacks national importance despite admirable purpose; benefits limited to customers, no broader field implications.

A pilot sought EB-2 NIW for work as search and rescue and air ambulance pilot-instructor. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to establish national importance: the proposed work would not have broader implications for aviation, did not show significant potential to employ U.S. workers, and offered no substantial economic effects.

An airline industry entrepreneur sought EB-2 exceptional ability with NIW. The AAO affirmed dismissal because the petitioner did not demonstrate expertise significantly above ordinary in the aviation industry. The decision did not reach NIW analysis.

An automotive glass manufacturer petitioned for an employee with experience in judging and scholarly publications in the field. The AAO found the beneficiary met two criteria but dismissed the appeal because the totality of evidence did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the very top in the field.

Pilot and flight instructor seeking EB-2 exceptional ability and national interest waiver. Director found substantial merit but denied national importance and NIW. AAO affirmed, concluding petitioner's proposed work training crew members and pilots does not have prospective impact rising to national importance level under Dhanasar.

Flight instructor with ratings from four countries seeking EB-2 and national interest waiver. Petitioner met three exceptional ability criteria and underwent final merits determination. AAO affirmed denial, finding petitioner's training work does not have prospective impact rising to national importance under Dhanasar framework.