Published AAO appeal decisions

A research scientist with Ph.D. in industrial engineering employed since 2021 sought EB-2 NIW for developing privacy-enhancing technology in digital advertising and healthcare. The AAO affirmed dismissal, finding inadequately documented prospective national importance. Though research has merit, the petitioner failed to demonstrate specific focus or impact rising to national importance. Later Dhanasar prongs were not reached.

A sports and exercise physiologist seeks EB-2 NIW with an advanced degree. The AAO found the proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance. Connection to national health initiatives is insufficient without demonstrating prospective impact. Reserved second and third prongs; dismissed appeal.

Weapons development specialist from Ukraine sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO dismissed, finding petitioner met at least three criteria but failed final merits determination, showing only government-level recognition without demonstrating sustained national or international acclaim.

A flight training curriculum manager seeking EB-2 national interest waiver claimed the proposed endeavor addresses pilot shortage with national importance. The AAO dismissed, finding insufficient evidence that the consulting services would extend beyond specific companies or offer innovations with wider implications for aviation industry advancement.

A cosmetologist seeks EB-2 NIW classification. The director found exceptional ability and that petitioner was well-positioned to advance the endeavor. The AAO affirmed lack of national importance: the business plan showed no substantial positive economic effects in New York or industry-wide impact on cosmetology, dismissing the appeal.

A solar energy company sponsored an accounting manager for EB-2 NIW work on accounting and financial duties for solar and battery storage projects. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the beneficiary's specific services lacked national importance because impact was limited to company and clients, not broader industry or economy.

Employer petitioned for NIW for project controls engineer managing capital improvement contracts for school districts. AAO dismissed appeal because engineer's specific work lacks national importance; role in contract administration does not advance STEM or field broadly; industry significance does not establish endeavor significance.

A battery test engineer seeks NIW for EB-2 with employer sponsorship to develop lithium battery and soft electronics materials. The AAO found substantial merit but not national importance, as the proposed work's impact is confined to the employer and customers without broader field or economic advancement.

A company petitioned for an industrial automation specialist seeking EB-2 exceptional ability classification with a national interest waiver. The service center denied it and dismissed a motion to reconsider. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner addressed the original denial, not errors in the motion dismissal, and tried to materially change the petition.

A dentist with advanced degree seeks EB-2 NIW to open and operate three dental practices. Although petitioner proposed employing forty workers and advanced implant techniques, the AAO found the endeavor lacks national importance. Benefits accrue only to patients served; no evidence of regional or national economic impact beyond private practice.

International banking manager with advanced degree sought NIW as EB-2 professional. AAO dismissed, finding industry importance does not establish national importance of specific proposed endeavor; petitioner failed to demonstrate prospective impact on field or economy beyond individual employment.

Pharmaceutical company petitioned for EB-2 NIW for data engineer managing digital platforms, AI, machine learning, and clinical trial data. AAO held proposed endeavor lacks national importance; it benefits only employer and collaborators, not broader industry or economy nationally.

Risk management professional with advanced degree seeking NIW for EB-2. Petitioner proposed developing risk models and market risk analytics for national economic benefit. AAO dismissed, finding proposed endeavor lacked national importance. Work was too narrowly tied to employer; vague assertions about preventing economic collapse insufficient. Well-positioned and balance prongs not reached.

Employer petitions for beneficiary seeking EB-2 NIW; beneficiary proposed to work as company president providing moving services to domestic violence victims. AAO affirmed dismissal of motion to reopen; proposed endeavor lacks national importance despite admirable purpose; benefits limited to customers, no broader field implications.

Senior iOS developer petitioned by software firm for O-1A visa. Petitioner claimed awards, membership in business organizations, judging, and high salary, but AAO found the submitted award lacked objective criteria and field recognition, membership failed to meet standards, and new claims on appeal were procedurally barred. Appeal dismissed.

Software company petitioned for product design director as EB-1A extraordinary ability. Petitioner claimed six criteria but director found none met. AAO affirmed, finding app features, vague judging letters, and design contributions insufficient for national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability classification.

Business management and restructuring consultant sought EB-2 NIW. AAO dismissed appeal, affirming Director's finding that proposed consulting endeavor lacked national importance under Dhanasar. Petitioner's focus on personal experience and general business optimization methodology did not establish particularized impact.

Automobile manufacturer petitions for advanced-degree beneficiary as global safety investigations and recalls coordinator. Claimed national importance via safety improvements and industry impact. AAO affirmed dismissal; substantial merit shown but lacks national importance; work improves employer operations without demonstrating broader automotive or safety recall industry impact.

Management consulting firm petitioned for beneficiary's EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Beneficiary met three evidentiary criteria (judging, scholarly articles, critical role) but AAO found evidence totality did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the very top of the field.

Squash professional petitioned by club for O-1A visa. Service center denied for failing to meet evidentiary criteria. Petitioner's appeal dismissed summarily for lack of specificity. Motions to reopen and reconsider dismissed because petitioner provided no new facts or evidence, and appellant brief was not properly filed with AAO.

Software company petitioned for senior director of professional services under EB-1A extraordinary ability. Met two of ten initial criteria. AAO upheld rejection of membership, published material, original contributions, and high salary criteria due to insufficient documentation of field-wide impact and recognition.

An airline pilot sought EB-2 classification as exceptional ability and NIW waiver. The AAO found the petitioner failed to satisfy at least three evidentiary criteria for exceptional ability and did not establish that the proposed endeavor of working as a commercial airline pilot had national importance. Appeal dismissed.

A data scientist employer-petitioner for EB-2 national interest waiver. Claimed proposed work in AI and technology would benefit national interest. AAO found endeavor lacks national importance—impact limited to employer and customers without broader field effects. Court reserved second and third prong analysis, dismissing appeal on first prong failure.

Pharmaceutical company petitioned for IT operations manager beneficiary under EB-2 national interest waiver. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance because work would not impact IT or pharmaceutical fields beyond the company and its clients, contrary to Dhanasar requirements.

A business petitioned for O-1A status for a physiotherapist, and the director denied it for failing the initial evidentiary requirements. On appeal, the AAO found the matter moot because another petition for the same worker had since been approved, so it did not reach the merits and dismissed the appeal.