Published AAO appeal decisions

Labor relations consultant sought NIW for EB-2 as individual of exceptional ability. AAO withdrew Service Center approval of EB-2 eligibility, finding insufficient evidence of advanced degree equivalent and required progressive work experience, rendering Dhanasar analysis unnecessary.

Senior process engineer with Ph.D. in physics sought national interest waiver for EB-2 advanced degree classification. Work involved development of materials and manufacturing processes. AAO found petitioner failed to establish national importance of proposed endeavor; general environmental goals and internal process improvements lack sufficient prospective impact; dismissed.

A business operations specialist seeks NIW for EB-2. AAO dismissed because petitioner failed to establish U.S. equivalency of foreign education and five years post-baccalaureate experience, thus failing underlying EB-2 qualification; Dhanasar analysis reserved as unnecessary.

An HR manager with advanced degree seeks NIW for EB-2. AAO dismissed because petitioner failed to articulate specific proposed endeavor beyond general field of HR management; lacks demonstrated national importance for waiver eligibility.

Fish market petitioner seeks extraordinary ability classification for beneficiary in business. Appeal dismissed summarily because petitioner failed to identify any erroneous conclusion of law or fact in the service center's denial and did not contest any aspect of the decision.

A petroleum engineer seeking NIW claimed ability to advance research on artificial lift technology. The AAO found the proposed endeavor met the first Dhanasar prong but dismissed the appeal because the engineer's publications, citations, education, and journal service did not demonstrate he was well positioned to advance the specific research.

A country club filed a motion to reopen and reconsider an O-1A denial for a tennis director. The AAO dismissed both motions for failure to meet procedural requirements: the motion lacked required statement about prior judicial proceedings and did not present proper cause, making merits review unnecessary.

Senior application engineer and researcher with advanced degree in electrical engineering sought NIW for EB-2. AAO found beneficiary qualified for EB-2 but dismissed appeal because proposed endeavor lacked sufficient national importance beyond the specific employer.

Senior electrical engineer seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver. Petitioner qualified for EB-2 as advanced degree professional but failed NIW first prong: proposed endeavor in wireless communication and device development lacked demonstrated national importance beyond company-specific applications.

A senior product manager in cloud computing sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner met only two of three minimum criteria and failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability.

Telecommunications hardware and software producer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability for beneficiary. Beneficiary met four regulatory criteria but failed final merits determination; limited commercialization and citations insufficient to demonstrate sustained international acclaim required for extraordinary ability.

Financial analyst seeking national interest waiver. Director found substantial merit but denied on national importance grounds. AAO affirmed; petitioner relied on prior accomplishments rather than demonstrating proposed work would impact industry broadly or create substantial U.S. economic effects.

A wholesale agricultural products company sought national interest waiver for a beneficiary. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the beneficiary failed to meet exceptional ability requirements and did not establish well-positioning to advance the proposed endeavor or that waiver would benefit the United States.

Postdoctoral biochemistry researcher sought extraordinary ability classification. Met only two of ten criteria despite claiming four additional ones on appeal. AAO found insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim or position among very top of field.

Metallurgist with advanced degree employed as research engineer sought national interest waiver of job offer requirement for EB-2 classification. AAO found proposed 3D printing research has substantial merit and national importance, and petitioner well positioned to advance it. However, petitioner failed to demonstrate that waiver would benefit United States on balance; dismissed.

Business executive sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Director granted advanced degree classification but denied waiver. AAO agreed waiver not warranted: petitioner's company growth lacked national economic significance, aviation training software and academy projects showed no substantial benefits extending beyond his companies to impact industry broadly.

A tennis academy petitioned for O-1A classification for a tennis coach. The coach competed in junior and men's circuits and taught tennis. AAO affirmed denial, finding the beneficiary met only two of eight criteria (employment in critical capacity and one other), failing to meet the required three. Membership, published materials, and original contributions were not sufficiently documented.

A materials scientist working for a manufacturer sought an EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver. The director had denied on the third prong. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the first Dhanasar prong unmet because the proposed endeavor's national importance and job creation were not shown, and reserved the remaining prongs.

Mental health organization petitioned for group facilitator and case manager claiming three Dhanasar prongs. AAO dismissed, finding record does not establish national importance because benefits appear limited to individual clients without broader field or regional economic implications beyond individual treatment.

Aircraft marketing company sponsoring aircraft design engineer for EB-2 national interest waiver. Beneficiary would perform engineering on passenger-to-ambulance and passenger-to-freight aircraft conversions. AAO affirmed denial, finding endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance because record does not show broader industry implications, specific employment details, or sufficient positive economic effects beyond company operations.

An engineering services company petitioned for an engineer and data scientist beneficiary. Claimed four criteria: judging, original contributions, scholarly articles, and leading role. AAO affirmed only two criteria (judging and scholarly articles) met; original contributions lacked demonstrated major significance and leading role lacked institutional evidence. Appeal dismissed.

Mechanical engineer employed by company seeks national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. Petitioner claimed his mechanical engineering work for automotive manufacturers would have national importance. AAO dismissed appeal, finding insufficient evidence that the specific proposed endeavor has national importance or substantial economic effects, failing the first Dhanasar prong.

Mechanical engineer with Ph.D. seeking EB-2 national interest waiver. Petitioner held advanced degree but failed to establish substantial merit and national importance of proposed endeavor under Dhanasar framework. AAO dismissed because petitioner did not differentiate proposed research from past work or demonstrate prospective impact.

Investment firm petitioned for investment banking executive beneficiary claiming six criteria. AAO found at most one criterion met and rejected the director's published material finding, concluding petitioner failed to establish extraordinary ability or the three-criterion threshold.