Published AAO appeal decisions

Civil and environmental engineer proposes infrastructure and sustainability research advancement. AAO held first prong met but second prong not met; petitioner's publications and citations lack evidence of implementation, government funding, or demonstrated progress toward advancing the specific proposed endeavor.

An interior designer sought EB-2 NIW to establish nonprofit organization promoting sustainable design through education and workshops. AAO affirmed denial, finding petitioner failed to demonstrate she was well positioned to advance the nonprofit endeavor due to insufficient evidence of current efforts and lack of secured funding.

A medical science liaison proposing a new medical consulting and training business sought a national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacks national importance due to insufficient documentation of prospective impact and benefits limited to the business and clients rather than broader healthcare industry.

Civil engineer sought EB-2 NIW for concrete innovation solutions in wet areas and flood zones. SCOPS found national importance but AAO disagreed and reserved that issue. Appeal dismissed because petitioner failed second prong: bachelor's degree insufficient, unsupported conclusory letters, no demonstrated partnerships or customer interest.

Postdoctoral candidate in electrical engineering with Master's degree sought EB-2 NIW for research in machine learning applications. AAO affirmed Service Center denial, finding endeavor has national importance but petitioner is not well positioned to advance it, lacking sufficient evidence of field influence or relevant party interest.

Graduate research assistant in cybersecurity self-petitions for EB-2 NIW. Proposes autonomous vehicle security research with substantial merit and national importance. AAO finds insufficient evidence of deployment impact, citation comparisons, or progress rendering her well positioned to advance the endeavor.

A postdoctoral researcher in metabolic diseases sought an EB-2 national interest waiver. She satisfied the first prong (substantial merit and national importance) but failed the second: she lacked a clear plan, institutional commitment, or funding evidence to demonstrate she was well-positioned to advance her work, so the appeal was dismissed.

A researcher in sustainable building and construction proposes to advance climate-resilient environmental research through peer publication and conferences. AAO held the proposed endeavor lacks national importance under Dhanasar's first prong because the record shows only ordinary research activities similar to all other researchers, without evidence of broader field impact or adoption by decision-makers.

Ph.D. student in computer science with research focus on human-machine interfaces and AI sought EB-2 with NIW. AAO reversed service center on prong one, finding national importance established, but affirmed dismissal after finding petitioner not well positioned to advance endeavor.

Entrepreneur developing smart parking facilities sought EB-2 NIW for U.S. business. AAO held the venture has substantial merit and petitioner is well-positioned to advance it, but the specific proposed endeavor lacks national importance; benefits limited to local economic activity and HUB Zone designation does not equate to economically depressed area.

Adaptive sports therapy specialist seeking NIW for EB-2 as advanced degree professional. AAO found endeavor lacks national importance despite substantial merit; local center lacks broader field implications. Petitioner not adequately positioned to advance endeavor. Appeal dismissed.

A security consultant sought EB-2 national interest waiver to establish a security services business. The AAO affirmed denial, finding the proposed business lacked national importance despite the field's merit, as its impact would not extend beyond specific clients to affect the security sector broadly.

Computer science researcher seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver claimed substantial merit, national importance, and ability to advance research independently. AAO found the first prong met but dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to demonstrate he was well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor.

Chemist seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver for research on biochemical processes for medical and energy applications. AAO found endeavor has substantial merit but lacks established national importance due to vague, inconsistent, and expansive claims. Appeal dismissed.

A business continuity planner seeks EB-2 NIW based on exceptional ability and national interest. The AAO found the endeavor has substantial merit but lacks demonstrated national importance because support for Latino small businesses lacks sufficient prospective economic impact or field-wide implications, and the petitioner failed the first Dhanasar prong.

Advanced degree professional sought NIW for EB-2 as commercial pilot, flight instructor, and consultant. AAO found substantial merit but rejected national importance prong, concluding proposed endeavor lacks sufficient breadth or impact to benefit national economy as required by Dhanasar framework. Appeal dismissed.

A biochemist with a Ph.D. in Korean integrative medicine seeks EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO agreed the proposed endeavor met the first Dhanasar prong but remanded because SCOPS inadequately analyzed the petitioner's h-index, citations, publications, and recommendations for the second prong.

A postdoctoral medical researcher with Ph.D. sought EB-2 national interest waiver for machine learning research on disease diagnosis and treatment. The AAO dismissed, holding that despite meeting the first prong, she failed the second prong: no secured funding, primarily collaborative research background, and insufficient evidence of independent success or detailed plan for future activities.

Doctoral researcher in microbiology and bioinformatics sought NIW for EB-2 classification. AAO found proposed research endeavor had substantial merit and national importance, and petitioner was well-positioned to advance it, but dismissed motion to reconsider because petitioner failed to demonstrate expertise significantly above ordinarily encountered in field.

An advanced degree professional in a STEM field proposes an endeavor with substantial merit and national importance. The AAO remanded because the service center improperly analyzed whether the petitioner is well-positioned to advance the endeavor and failed to adequately explain the balance-of-benefits analysis under Dhanasar.

A postdoctoral medical researcher seeks NIW for EB-2 to continue postdoctoral research. AAO found the endeavor has substantial merit and national importance but the petitioner is not well-positioned to advance it; she plays a support role, lacks demonstrated funding, and has limited research impact.

Mechanical engineer researcher self-petitioner sought NIW under EB-2 for thermal battery development research. AAO affirmed first prong met but reversed on second prong, finding PhD degree and citations insufficient to demonstrate she is well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor.

Software developer sought NIW with advanced degree. Proposed autonomous vehicle safety research. AAO found petitioner not well positioned to advance proposed endeavor under Dhanasar second prong: master's degree and citations insufficient without prior funding, government interest, or validated model comparable to Dhanasar precedent. First and third prongs reserved.

Postdoctoral fellow in biomedical research sought EB-2 NIW with advanced degree. Proposed cancer research endeavor met substantial merit and national importance, but AAO found petitioner not well positioned to advance it: lacking significant funded grant record, evidence of work adoption by others, or comprehensive future plan despite strong academic credentials.

AI researcher sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver for research on information retrieval and natural language processing. SCOPS initially approved then revoked. AAO sustained appeal, finding petitioner established national importance of endeavor, demonstrated requisite expertise, and proved waiver would benefit the United States.