Published AAO appeal decisions

An environmental scientist with a master's degree in natural resources engineering sought EB-2 NIW classification based on research in urban water management and sustainability. The AAO agreed the research had substantial merit and national importance but found she was not well-positioned to advance it independently and had not shown benefit of waiver over labor certification. Appeal dismissed.

Scientist with Ph.D. in biomedical sciences sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. Met two of three required criteria (judging and scholarly articles). AAO rejected original contributions claim; publications and citations alone insufficient to prove major significance. Appeal dismissed for failure to meet three-criteria threshold.

Medical researcher seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver. Claimed medical research endeavor had national importance and that she was well positioned to advance it. AAO found petitioner failed to identify a specific and consistent proposed endeavor; record reflected numerous changing activities. Appeal dismissed after second denial.

A woman who participates in a government medical research study because she carries a particular genetic variant sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with a national interest waiver. The appeal was dismissed because she claimed no regulatory criteria, showed no comparable evidence, and did not show that a biological trait is an occupation. The waiver framework was not reached.

Senior life science product consultant claimed extraordinary ability through six criteria. Director found two met. AAO found three criteria satisfied and withdrew denial, requiring final merits review to assess sustained national or international acclaim at the very top of the field.

A research scientist filed an extraordinary ability petition that the service center denied for failing to meet three of ten criteria. On appeal, the AAO did not review the merits because the petitioner had since become a permanent resident, making the matter moot, and dismissed the appeal.

Psychological science researcher with Ph.D. sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. AAO sustained appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs met: proposed research has substantial merit and national importance; petitioner is well positioned to advance it; waiver benefits U.S. interests.

A neurobiology researcher sought extraordinary ability classification after the service center found the initial evidentiary criteria unmet. The researcher filed two appeals of that denial. The AAO sustained the other appeal, so this duplicate appeal was dismissed as moot, and the petition will be approved through the sustained appeal.

Researcher in biology seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability. AAO affirmed dismissal because petitioner met only two of ten evidentiary criteria (judging, scholarly articles) but the decision rejects original contributions criterion; does not qualify as individual of extraordinary ability.

Medical researcher with Ph.D. sought national interest waiver after director found advanced degree eligibility. AAO held all three Dhanasar prongs met: proposed research has substantial merit and national importance, petitioner well positioned to advance it, and waiver benefits United States based on her demonstrated expertise and contributions.

Cardiovascular researcher met two criteria but needed three. Original contributions criterion failed: guidelines participation and citations lack specific evidence of major significance; reference letters too conclusory; prestigious journal publication alone insufficient. Record does not demonstrate sustained acclaim or top-tier status required for extraordinary ability.

A professor and researcher with PhD sought EB-2 NIW for proposed research endeavor. AAO sustained appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs met: endeavor had national importance, petitioner was well positioned to advance it, and waiver would benefit the United States.

Pathologist and professor seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Met three of ten criteria: judging, scholarly articles, and critical role at family company. AAO dismissed appeal, finding no sustained national or international acclaim; achievements were routine academic duties and family-based rather than demonstrating top-tier standing.

A neuroscientist with postdoctoral research position seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. He claimed three criteria: judging, scholarly articles, and original contributions. The AAO found he met judging and scholarly articles but not original contributions of major significance. He failed to meet the final merits threshold requiring sustained national or international acclaim.

Geology researcher sought national interest waiver as member of professions with advanced degree. AAO found proposed research on microfossils and environmental assessments had substantial merit and national importance, but dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to demonstrate she was well positioned to advance the research independently without primary investigator responsibility.

Medical researcher sought EB-2 national interest waiver. Petitioner lacked advanced degree equivalency and failed to meet exceptional ability criteria. On appeal, she added entrepreneurship role materially changing the petition, which USCIS rejected as improper modification rather than clarification during RFE response.

Biochemistry researcher with Ph.D. from India, conducted research in United States via J-1 visa. Claimed five criteria; met judging and scholarly articles only. Awards, published material, and original contributions rejected. Final merits determination found no sustained acclaim or top-tier status despite meeting two evidentiary criteria. Appeal dismissed.

A post-doctoral research associate in entomology sought NIW for EB-2 classification. The AAO held the proposed endeavor lacks sufficient specificity and documented broader impact; prior publication citations and speaking engagements do not establish that future teaching, mentoring, and research would impact the field nationally rather than only serve local students and institutions.

Medical science researcher and professor sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Petitioner claimed and met at least three evidentiary criteria including original contributions, scholarly articles, and judging. AAO found sustained acclaim reflected in publication record and citation history, qualifying petitioner as among the very top of the field.

Biophysicist and CEO seeks extraordinary ability classification. Claimed five criteria; court found four met. AAO conducted final merits determination, finding sustained national and international acclaim through extensive documentation of achievements, citations, patents, and research impact warranting extraordinary ability classification.

Biochemistry researcher sought NIW for EB-2 classification for brain tumor research. Petitioner demonstrated substantial merit and national importance of proposed research, strong qualifications to advance it, and past successful contributions. AAO held all three Dhanasar prongs met and waiver merited.

Medical epidemiologist sought EB-2 advanced degree with NIW to advance public health preparedness and emergency response focusing on vaccine preventable diseases. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner met first Dhanasar prong but failed second prong; evidence submitted post-filing was inadmissible, and petitioner did not rebut director's finding of insufficient positioning.

Physician seeking NIW under EB-2 for proposed work as medical scientist conducting disease research. AAO held first prong met but second prong failed because petitioner is not well positioned to conduct medical research given background only in medical practice. Substantial material change between initial and revised proposed endeavors also demonstrated lack of positioning.

Public health specialist seeks NIW for work in immunization, disease prevention, and maternal health. AAO held while public health field has merit, petitioner failed to identify specific projects or demonstrate prospective work extends beyond employers to impact public health field broadly at national level.

A postdoctoral biochemistry researcher sought an NIW under Dhanasar for developing novel disease treatment derivatives. The AAO sustained the appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs met: proposed research had substantial merit and national importance, petitioner was well positioned to advance it, and balance favored waiver of job offer requirement.