Published AAO appeal decisions

A self-petitioner sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification, and the service center denied the petition. The appeal was dismissed on procedural grounds because the notice of appeal carried a script-font signature rather than the petitioner's personal signature, so the substantive criteria were never examined.

Airline pilot sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification claiming published material, original contributions, and critical role. AAO affirmed denial, finding no major award and failing to meet three regulatory criteria. Petitioner's safety innovations and comparable evidence claims rejected as insufficient.

Commercial pilot from Panama sought NIW for EB-2. AAO held petitioner failed to establish exceptional ability: only two criteria met (degree and license), not three required. Insufficient evidence of ten years experience, exceptional salary, professional association membership, or industry recognition. Underlying visa eligibility denied; NIW not analyzed.

A geologist sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with a national interest waiver. After an earlier appeal and several motions were dismissed, the petitioner filed a combined motion to reopen and reconsider. The AAO dismissed both: the delay in the prior late motion was not shown reasonable or beyond his control, and no legal error was identified.

A self-petitioner seeking extraordinary ability classification had the petition denied, then lost an appeal and five motions. This sixth combined motion to reopen and reconsider was dismissed. The AAO found no new facts, no legal or policy error, and no basis to excuse the earlier untimely filing, which was within the petitioner's control.

An airplane pilot sought EB-2 national interest waiver for a proposed aviation training business in Florida. AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance. The business plan lacked specifics on wages, worker numbers, location, and how the endeavor would have broader implications beyond the aviation industry.

Commercial pilot and flight instructor seeks EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. Petitioner failed to establish foreign equivalent to U.S. advanced degree; diploma was three-year credential equivalent to only U.S. bachelor's degree. Intended occupation does not meet profession requirement; petition dismissed.

A petitioner claiming exceptional ability for an EB-2 national interest waiver filed successive motions to reopen and reconsider after initial denials. The AAO dismissed the second motion, finding the petitioner had been given notice of required evidence and a reasonable opportunity to submit it, and that no new facts or legal errors warranted reconsideration.

A self-petitioning professional with an advanced degree sought a national interest waiver. After earlier denial and several dismissed appeals and motions, a fourth combined motion to reopen and reconsider claimed ineffective assistance of prior counsel. The AAO dismissed it because no prejudice or substantial compliance with the required procedure was shown, and the arguments were repeated.

An individual seeking extraordinary ability classification had a petition denied and an earlier appeal dismissed. Combined motions to reopen and reconsider were filed after the 33-day deadline, and the delay was not shown to be reasonable and beyond the petitioner's control. The AAO dismissed both motions as untimely and for lacking new facts or legal error.

A self-petitioner sought extraordinary ability classification, and the appeal was previously summarily dismissed along with earlier motions. On a second combined motion, the AAO dismissed both the motion to reopen and the motion to reconsider because no new facts, brief, evidence, or legal error were shown. No criteria were decided.

An airline pilot sought EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver to work as a pilot and ground instructor. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to establish that his proposed endeavor addressing pilot shortage had substantial merit or national importance; support letters remained too vague about prospective impact.

A pilot and aviation consultant sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. He claimed three criteria but failed to establish any. Pilot certification is not association membership; employer companies lack documented distinguished reputation; salary evidence compared pilots not consultants. AAO dismissed, finding insufficient initial evidence.

A motorcycle mechanic and instructor sought an EB-2 national interest waiver for his own business. The AAO dismissed the appeal after finding he did not meet the underlying EB-2 exceptional ability requirement; therefore it did not reach the Dhanasar waiver prongs.

Petitioner seeks NIW as advanced degree professional. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner failed to establish five years progressive post-baccalaureate experience in specialty as required for underlying EB-2 classification; NIW eligibility not reached.

A commercial airline pilot and captain with advanced qualifications proposed pilot and flight instructor work and aviation safety consultancy. The AAO held his expertise and prior success, while relevant to positioning under the second prong, do not establish national importance of the specific proposed endeavor, which lacks demonstrated broader implications for the aviation industry.

Pilot with advanced degree seeks EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. AAO affirmed denial, finding petitioner failed to demonstrate that proposed aviation safety and survival training endeavor has national importance beyond immediate clientele, focusing on specific endeavor rather than industry importance.

Rope access specialist sought EB-2 national interest waiver. AAO held endeavor lacks national importance because general industry benefits do not demonstrate prospective impact commensurate with national scope. Appeal dismissed without reaching second and third Dhanasar prongs.

Petitioner seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Service center denied petition; AAO remanded matter to director for full consideration of entire record including claims and evidence submitted with appeal. No analysis of specific criteria provided.

Pilot seeking NIW to provide aviation instruction services. AAO dismissed appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacks national importance under Dhanasar because instruction would not impact the field more broadly and occupational shortages are addressed through labor certification.

Petitioner sought extraordinary ability classification. On motion after adverse appeal, petitioner reargued same facts and claims previously addressed. AAO rejected new awards arguments and other criteria. Motion lacked genuine new facts supported by documentary evidence. Petition remains denied.

A self-petitioner sought an EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver. The service center denied it as not well positioned, then dismissed a combined motion. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner did not challenge the finding that the motion stated no new facts, so the issue was waived.

A military chaplain with advanced foreign degrees sought EB-2 classification and national interest waiver. The AAO found she met the advanced degree requirement but dismissed her appeal because her proposed military chaplain endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance beyond serving individual servicemembers.

Automotive service technician seeks EB-2 NIW for process toolmaking and quality control in automotive manufacturing. AAO dismissed appeal on two independent grounds: deficient signature on appeal form, and lack of national importance of proposed endeavor under Dhanasar first prong.