Published AAO appeal decisions

A chief academic officer self-petitioner sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver for online education business. The AAO dismissed because the petitioner failed to articulate a specific proposed endeavor, instead describing multiple overlapping positions and activities without clear delineation.

A neurobiology researcher sought extraordinary ability classification after the service center found the initial evidentiary criteria unmet. The researcher filed two appeals of that denial. The AAO sustained the other appeal, so this duplicate appeal was dismissed as moot, and the petition will be approved through the sustained appeal.

Dental surgeon seeking NIW for advanced degree EB-2 to establish dental clinic. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance, petitioner not well positioned to advance it given focus on esthetician work, and labor shortage insufficient to balance waiver factors.

Self-petitioner speech and theatrical coach sought EB-1A classification. Met three preliminary criteria: judging, published material, critical role. AAO dismissed appeal because evidence did not establish sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability classification.

Chief executive officer and solutions architect claimed four criteria including membership, published material, leading role, and high salary. AAO found none met. YPO membership lacked demonstrated outstanding achievement standard. Published materials insufficient in prominence or attribution. Executive experience alone does not establish upper echelon status required.

A robotics engineer proposed establishing a U.S.-based company providing remote-control services and consulting. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to establish that the proposed endeavor has national importance; generic field information and personal intentions do not demonstrate projected impact rising to substantial positive economic effects.

Information technology director seeking EB-2 advanced degree or exceptional ability classification with national interest waiver. AAO found petitioner failed to establish foreign education equivalent to U.S. bachelor's degree and did not meet three criteria for exceptional ability. National importance of proposed endeavor also not established under Dhanasar framework.

Application manager seeks NIW for EB-2 advanced degree classification. Proposed IT work providing services to organizations with important missions. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance; while petitioner was highly qualified and IT field important, no evidence showed specific proposed endeavor would impact IT field broadly or create substantial economic or employment benefits nationally.

Physical therapist and doula with advanced degree seeking national interest waiver for EB-2. Petitioner claimed endeavor has national importance due to therapist shortage and Brazilian healthcare knowledge. AAO found petitioner submitted industry-level data but failed to demonstrate her specific endeavor would have national importance; individual patient care and business startup lack evidence of broader field impact.

A freight transportation entrepreneur sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with a national interest waiver. The appeal was dismissed because the AAO withdrew the service center's findings on degree, license and membership criteria, since the degree was unrelated and the license and membership post-dated filing. The waiver framework was left unaddressed.

A database engineer with MBA sought NIW for freelance work and founding an online IT school. AAO dismissed appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacked national importance and petitioner was not well positioned to advance the online school despite having relevant experience and business background.

Transportation engineer with bachelor's degree and work experience sought EB-2 with NIW. AAO found he lacked sufficient post-baccalaureate experience for advanced degree classification and his proposed traffic engineering endeavor lacked the national importance required for waiver under Dhanasar.

Former customs official sought NIW for EB-2 classification to establish customs consulting firm and clearance services in United States. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance beyond petitioner's clientele, petitioner lacks entrepreneurial experience despite customs expertise, and therefore waiver not warranted.

A journalism professor proposing an open-access radio content institute for training and broadcasting. AAO held that while substantial merit was established, national importance was not; evidence lacked demonstrable prospective impact on field or broader implications commensurate with national significance.

Professional freestyle wrestler seeks NIW for EB-2 advanced degree classification. Proposed competing and coaching for university wrestling club to increase U.S. athletic competitiveness. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance despite substantial merit; evidence showed petitioner's skills and value but no documentation of prospective impact on sport broadly or significant employment or economic benefits.

A solution director in supply chain and manufacturing technology sought extraordinary ability classification, claiming four criteria. The Director accepted two. The AAO found only judging satisfied, rejected original contributions and leading role, treated scholarly articles as waived, and dismissed because acclaim was confined to employers and collaborators.

Dentist sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Petitioner did not establish underlying EB-2 eligibility as advanced degree professional (lacked DDS/DMD equivalent) or exceptional ability (only met two of six criteria). AAO dismissed appeal.

Nurse petitioner self-filed for EB-2 with NIW, proposing to provide expert nursing advice and treatment at a healthcare facility. AAO dismissed: the proposed endeavor lacks national importance because it benefits only the specific employer and patients, not the broader field, and general industry reports about nursing shortages do not address the specific endeavor's national impact.

A sailing instructor sought extraordinary ability classification, with the director finding neither a major internationally recognized award nor three evidentiary criteria shown. On appeal the petitioner submitted letters but identified no error of law or fact in the denial, so the appeal was summarily dismissed without examining the underlying evidence.

An entrepreneur and researcher in cybersecurity on O-1 visa sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO affirmed dismissal, finding he satisfied only two of ten criteria and thus failed the initial threshold, with aggregate review showing insufficient acclaim and recognition required for the classification.

Researcher in biology seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability. AAO affirmed dismissal because petitioner met only two of ten evidentiary criteria (judging, scholarly articles) but the decision rejects original contributions criterion; does not qualify as individual of extraordinary ability.

A commercial pilot sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with a national interest waiver of the job offer. The AAO withdrew the director's findings on the academic record, experience and membership criteria, leaving too few criteria met. It dismissed the appeal and reserved the waiver question without applying the Dhanasar framework.

A radiologist seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability classification met the threshold evidentiary criteria but failed the final merits determination. The AAO found that while the petitioner demonstrated substantial accomplishments and institutional affiliations, the evidence did not establish sustained national or international acclaim at the very top of nuclear medicine.

A nurse sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. AAO affirmed denial, finding the petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance of her proposed nursing services endeavor. The decision held that providing nursing services lacks the broader field implications and substantial economic effects required under Dhanasar.

A Venezuelan OB/GYN physician claimed extraordinary ability through eight criteria. The AAO found two criteria met: judging and scholarly articles. However, these routine academic activities lack the acclaim requirement, and the petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international recognition or widespread field impact.