Published AAO appeal decisions

Postdoctoral research scientist in pharmaceutical sciences claimed three evidentiary criteria, all met at initial stage. AAO upheld dismissal because evidence of peer review, citations, and articles did not establish sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the very top of the field as required.

Petitioner sought EB-2 national interest waiver. Motion to reconsider argued prior AAO decision misapplied the Dhanasar framework and evidentiary standards. AAO dismissed because petitioner merely reargued facts already considered and failed to identify specific legal or policy errors in the prior decision.

A petroleum engineer with master's degree in sustainable energy sought NIW for EB-2, planning to join an oil-gas company or establish a consulting firm. The AAO dismissed appeal after finding proposed endeavor in energy optimization and well integrity lacks national importance. Alignment with federal energy priorities and professional qualifications insufficient without concrete prospective impact.

Marketing manager in digital commerce sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO affirmed SCOPS denial, finding petitioner satisfied only two criteria and failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability.

A construction manager in transportation infrastructure sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. He claimed to meet judging, high salary, and leading role criteria. AAO found judging criterion met and remanded salary criterion analysis, but concluded he failed to demonstrate the three required criteria and thus lacked extraordinary ability.

A powerlifting coach claimed extraordinary ability under EB-1A, meeting three initial criteria. The AAO found he failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the very top of his field because his judging experience lacked prestige, his published articles received no citations, and his accomplishments were insufficiently documented.

An IT specialist and entrepreneur sought NIW for enterprise architecture and SAP transformation advisory services. AAO dismissed because the applicant failed to demonstrate national importance of the specific proposed endeavor; lack of evidence corroborating job creation projections and economic impact claims.

Sustainable design consultant with experience in architecture and urban planning seeks to transform U.S. urban housing through sustainable, recycled materials like shipping containers. Claimed endeavor has national importance. AAO dismissed appeal, finding endeavor lacks demonstrated national importance and broader field implications required by Dhanasar.

Entrepreneur and operations manager proposing eco-friendly swimwear manufacturing and distribution business claiming national interest waiver. AAO dismissed appeal, finding endeavor lacks national importance; sustainability claims vague and speculative, niche market focus insufficient for material influence on industry or economy at national scale.

Film producer petitions for EB-1A extraordinary ability. SCOPS found four criteria met but denied for insufficient sustained acclaim at top of field. AAO dismissed, finding only one criterion (judging) actually met and threshold not satisfied.

Occupational health professional appealed NIW denial under Dhanasar framework. AAO affirmed that while proposed endeavor had substantial merit, petitioner failed to establish its national importance. Consulting business lacked sufficiently specific prospective national impact and significant potential to employ U.S. workers or generate substantial economic effects. Appeal dismissed.

A computer information systems professional proposed modernization services to small and medium enterprises. The AAO held the endeavor lacks national importance under Dhanasar; services to direct clients alone do not establish broader field impact or global implications needed for national importance. Appeal dismissed.

A Ph.D. student in informatics sought NIW for EB-2 classification with advanced degree. The AAO dismissed appeal after finding the proposed AI research endeavor lacks national importance. Field importance and STEM or critical emerging technology status alone do not establish specific endeavor's national importance.

HR specialist with advanced degree seeking NIW for startup providing tech-enabled HR services to small businesses. AAO dismissed appeal, finding endeavor has substantial merit but lacks demonstrated national importance; projections of indirect job creation insufficient without specifics on location or type.

Financial engineer with advanced degree seeking NIW to develop personalized retirement planning services and hire 49 employees. Claimed financial education is urgent national priority. AAO held working in important field insufficient; proposed endeavor lacks unique methodologies or national implications; impacts only clientele, not field broadly.

Structural engineer seeks EB-1A classification. Membership and display criteria abandoned by failure to respond to RFE. Original contributions not established as major significance; sole attribution not demonstrated. SCOPS decision affirmed as reasoned. Petitioner did not establish three of ten criteria required for extraordinary ability classification; appeal dismissed.

Business researcher proposed financial-marketing integration model for small business performance, then materially expanded endeavor during RFE response to include professorship, additional research areas, and advisory work. AAO dismissed appeal: petitioner substantially altered claims after SCOPS identified deficiency, making foundational endeavor undefined and preventing proper Dhanasar framework application.

Helicopter pilot claimed EB-1A extraordinary ability based on being first female pilot in jurisdiction and other criteria. Service center found only published material satisfied. AAO affirmed, finding award was appreciation certificate, judging claim unsupported, and being first female lacks regulatory significance. With only one criterion met, threshold requirements failed. Appeal dismissed.

A computer science researcher with a PhD seeks EB-2 with NIW based on AI and STEM education research. SCOPS found she qualified for underlying EB-2 but denied NIW. The AAO affirmed because her proposed endeavor lacked sufficient specificity and corroborating evidence to establish national importance under Dhanasar's first prong.

Ph.D. student in molecular biology proposes cancer research on environmental, molecular, and genetic disease mechanisms. AAO found proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance but dismissed appeal because petitioner insufficient evidence of prior success or progress to show capacity to advance the proposed research.

Business systems analyst claimed eight criteria for EB-1A extraordinary ability. AAO found she met at least three criteria at step one but lacked sustained national or international acclaim and recognition of extraordinary ability at the merits stage, dismissing the appeal.

A civil engineer sought NIW for advanced-degree EB-2, proposing a scaffolding and shoring equipment business in Florida. The AAO dismissed the appeal, agreeing the endeavor had substantial merit but finding insufficient evidence that the specific endeavor would have national importance beyond local impact or economic significance.

Advanced degree professional in health policy sought national interest waiver for mental health initiative emphasizing health-in-all-policies approach. AAO affirmed denial, finding record lacked evidence of how the specific proposed endeavor would advance the field with national or global implications.

A lawyer and entrepreneur sought EB-2 national interest waiver to operate a legal and financial services firm. The AAO found the proposed endeavor lacked national importance despite claims of job creation and serving national clientele. The decision focused on the specific business impact rather than industry importance, dismissing the appeal.

Mechanical engineer petitioner seeks NIW for self-sponsored work on driving automation technologies. Claimed substantial merit and national importance of proposed endeavor. AAO affirmed denial, finding work lacked demonstrated national importance beyond employer and failed first prong.