Published AAO appeal decisions

Marketing manager with advanced degree sought NIW for EB-2. Petitioner proposed providing marketing and business development services for Brazil-U.S. market connections. AAO found proposed endeavor lacked national importance and specific prospective impact, and declined to address remaining Dhanasar prongs.

Chief technology officer claims extraordinary ability based on patents and press coverage. AAO found articles focus on company work, not personal achievements, and patents lack demonstrated major significance in field. Appeal dismissed without reaching remaining criteria.

Cancer researcher sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Claimed five criteria; Director found two met. Petitioner on appeal asserted three additional criteria and high salary. AAO found only two criteria satisfied overall and dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to meet the three-criterion threshold for extraordinary ability.

A postdoctoral researcher in computational chemistry sought EB-1A classification. The AAO found he satisfied three initial criteria: judging, scholarly articles, and original contributions. However, the final merits determination concluded he lacked the sustained national or international acclaim required, despite recognizable contributions early in his career.

Quality assurance associate in pharmaceutical industry sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Claimed four criteria; director found two met. AAO dismissed, holding petitioner failed to meet three of ten required criteria and lacks the sustained acclaim and top-tier recognition required.

Architectural drafter sought EB-2 NIW classification. Proposed to work on healthcare facility design and eventually become senior designer. AAO dismissed, holding proposed work lacks national importance; confined to employer projects without demonstrating substantial positive economic effects or broader field impact.

A security advisor seeks NIW for EB-2 claiming a security management and counterterrorism role of national importance. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner did not sufficiently demonstrate that the specific proposed endeavor has national importance beyond general field significance; evidence of prospective impact was insufficient.

Business consultant with 25 years experience in Brazilian market entry seeks NIW for consultancy services to North American firms. AAO dismissed appeal, finding endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; proposed work impacts individual clients only, not the field broadly.

CEO and fire protection company owner seeks NIW as EB-2 advanced degree professional. Claimed substantial merit and national importance of fire protection business operations. AAO affirmed Director's finding of substantial merit but denied national importance; work does not demonstrate significant impact on industry broadly or substantial economic benefits to region or nation.

Real estate and construction entrepreneur seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver. Petitioner qualified for EB-2 as advanced degree professional but failed NIW first prong: proposed entrepreneurial services in real estate lacked demonstrated national importance; assertions about economically depressed areas and job creation unsupported by credible business plan.

Research scientist in molecular virology claimed four criteria. AAO found three met: judging, original contributions, and scholarly articles. However, appeal dismissed because evidence as a whole does not show sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the very top of the field.

CEO of retail services company sought EB-1A classification. Claimed awards, membership, and leading role criteria. AAO affirmed director finding of only one criterion met. Record lacks evidence of national or international acclaim or place among top echelon of field required.

A neurological surgeon claimed seven criteria for EB-1A extraordinary ability. The AAO affirmed the Director's finding that she met judging and scholarly articles but rejected awards and membership, and determined that meeting only two criteria did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at the top tier.

Software engineer sought NIW for EB-2 classification. Petitioner claimed software development for U.S. companies would benefit national economy. AAO held the proposed endeavor lacks national importance because it would benefit only immediate employers and clients without broader industry or economic implications.

Marketing manager sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Qualified as advanced degree professional but failed Dhanasar test: proposed marketing work benefited only employer, lacking documented broader field implications or substantial economic benefits needed for national importance.

An attorney specializing in environmental and energy law sought EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO found substantial merit in the proposed endeavor but concluded the petitioner failed to establish national importance under Dhanasar's first prong; recommendation letters addressed past work rather than the specific prospective endeavor details required.

A dentist/manager sought EB-2 national interest waiver to open a dental practice and mobile services in Florida. The AAO affirmed the director's finding that while the petitioner qualified as advanced degree professional, the proposed endeavor lacked national importance; serving specific patients and markets did not demonstrate broader field or economic impact.

Financial manager sought NIW as EB-2 member of professions with advanced degree. Petitioner proposed work advising on financial investments and capital allocation. AAO affirmed denial, finding insufficient evidence that proposed endeavor would impact the financial field or nation's economy broadly or create substantial US employment.

A well control instructor sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. The AAO found the petitioner qualified as an advanced degree professional and that the proposed endeavor had substantial merit, but the specific work lacked national importance beyond the employer and its contractors.

A film and television director sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO found she satisfied only the judging criterion and concluded she had not demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim or status among the small percentage at the very top of her field.

A financial manager seeks NIW under EB-2. He claimed his proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance. The AAO found substantial merit but not national importance because his work would not extend beyond his employer to impact the financial services field more broadly.

An aeronautical engineer sought a national interest waiver for EB-2 classification to advise aviation manufacturers. The AAO dismissed the appeal because his proposed specific endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance despite his expertise and credentials, failing to show sufficient prospective impact on the aviation industry.

Global supply chain director seeks NIW to work with small U.S. companies serving the aerospace sector. Petitioner claimed proposed endeavor has national importance. AAO affirmed denial, finding the specific endeavor lacks national importance; economic benefits limited to particular employers or clients without broader field implications.

Actor in Chinese film, television and theater sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. AAO dismissed appeal, holding petitioner met three regulatory criteria but failed the final merits determination requiring sustained national or international acclaim and placement among the small percentage at the very top of the field.

An associate professor of geotechnical engineering in Venezuela sought EB-1A classification. He claimed seven criteria but met only two: judging and scholarly articles. The AAO dismissed because he failed to establish three criteria, and the record did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that he ranks among the very top in his field.