Published AAO appeal decisions

Film and animation director sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO affirmed advanced degree qualification but dismissed appeal, holding proposed endeavor failed to demonstrate national importance; cultural significance of intended television and film projects insufficient without evidence of prospective impact.

A musician sought EB-1A classification by claiming eight criteria. The AAO found one criterion satisfied but dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to establish three of ten required criteria. The decision held that the petitioner lacked the sustained national or international acclaim and top-tier status required for extraordinary ability.

An AI researcher self-petitioning for EB-1A extraordinary ability. Claimed six evidentiary criteria and final merits assessment. AAO found only two criteria met (judging and scholarly articles), falling short of the required three. Record lacks evidence of major significance, widespread influence, or national acclaim necessary for extraordinary ability classification.

Industrial designer seeking NIW classification. Petitioner claimed substantial merit and national importance for endeavor offering design and branding services. AAO held proposed endeavor amounted to job search lacking prospective impact beyond future employers, insufficient for national importance; appeal dismissed.

A dancer and dance instructor seeks EB-1A classification. The petitioner claimed four criteria, but the AAO found the awards lacked national recognition and judging evidence was deficient. Two other criteria were reserved as not dispositive. The AAO dismissed because petitioner failed to meet either one major award or three of ten criteria, lacking sustained acclaim at the top of the field.

Cartography manager sought EB-2 NIW for GIS development and consulting project. AAO dismissed, finding no sufficient documentary evidence establishing the specific proposed endeavor has national importance or broader field impact despite working in important data technology sector.

A CEO of an aquaculture company transitioning from decades in information technology claims extraordinary ability. He claimed four criteria, but the AAO held only one was satisfied. The decision ruled his IT accomplishments lack nexus to his stated aquaculture field and rejected his scholarly article as unrelated.

Dentist holding advanced degree seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver. Petitioner proposed consulting and research in laser dentistry. AAO found the proposed endeavor lacked sufficient specificity and evidence demonstrating potential prospective impact at national importance level. Appeal dismissed under first prong of Dhanasar.

An architect seeking EB-2 national interest waiver for sustainable housing design work claimed the endeavor addresses U.S. housing crisis with national importance. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding insufficient evidence of how the specific proposed projects would have prospective impact of national importance beyond general industry assertions.

A hemodialysis nurse sought EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver for her proposed mobile dialysis service company. The AAO affirmed denial, finding the endeavor showed substantial merit addressing kidney disease but lacked the national importance required under Dhanasar because it would not impact the field broadly or generate substantial economic effects beyond serving her own patients.

A military chaplain with advanced foreign degrees sought EB-2 classification and national interest waiver. The AAO found she met the advanced degree requirement but dismissed her appeal because her proposed military chaplain endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance beyond serving individual servicemembers.

An exercise physiologist and entrepreneur sought EB-2 classification and national interest waiver for work in exercise physiology and business. The AAO affirmed the service center's denial because the petitioner failed to demonstrate his proposed endeavor had national importance beyond his individual clients and lacked evidence of substantial economic impact.

Semiconductor equipment engineer sought NIW claiming to operate and maintain semiconductor manufacturing facilities. AAO dismissed because the proposed endeavor lacked sufficient specificity and detail; showing work in an important field alone does not establish national importance of the specific endeavor.

CEO/manager in business sought EB-1A classification claiming three criteria: judging, leading role, and high salary. Director found only leading role established. AAO dismissed, holding high salary claim failed due to inadequate comparison data and insufficient differential from survey averages.

A systems administrator specializing in cybersecurity claims extraordinary ability in cybersecurity and computer science. He claimed three criteria but satisfied only one. The AAO rejected his ISSA membership and scholarly articles evidence, finding insufficient documentation of extraordinary ability.

Self-petitioner integration architect in energy efficiency claiming extraordinary ability. Advanced three criteria on appeal; failed original contributions as major significance not demonstrated beyond employer context. AAO dismissed appeal because claimed criteria insufficient and aggregate record lacks sustained acclaim.

A pharmacist sought EB-1A classification. She claimed membership in associations, scholarly articles, display at artistic events, and leading roles. The AAO affirmed the Director's finding that she met none of the ten criteria, failing to reach the required minimum of three, and dismissed the appeal.

Business owner in economically depressed area sought EB-2 with NIW for beauty care and candy distribution company claiming national importance through cultural enrichment and economic benefits. AAO held location in depressed area alone insufficient; proposed endeavor lacks significant employment potential or substantial positive economic effects.

Entrepreneur seeking NIW to operate investment management company serving Brazilian ultra-high-net-worth individuals in Florida. AAO dismissed appeal, finding the specific endeavor lacks national importance despite substantial merit; benefits limited to prospective clients and employees without broader field impact.

A recruiter in financial analysis sought NIW as EB-2 exceptional ability individual proposing to establish a recruitment consulting business. The AAO found substantial merit but dismissed the appeal, holding that the proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance without evidence of broad economic effects.

Self-petitioner marketing manager proposing green marketing consulting business. Claimed national interest waiver under Dhanasar. AAO dismissed appeal finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance despite substantial merit determination; insufficient evidence of prospective impact beyond business clients.

Cybersecurity and IT teacher seeks NIW for EB-2 advanced degree classification as IT professional. Claimed endeavor would reduce fraud and identity theft nationwide. AAO dismissed appeal, finding no demonstrated national importance or broad prospective impact beyond specific employers required under Dhanasar framework.

Marketing entrepreneur sought national interest waiver claiming expertise in Brazilian advertising market beneficial to US expansion efforts. AAO found proposed endeavor lacks substantial merit and national importance, affecting only prospective employers and clients without broader impact on advertising field or economy, and no demonstrated job creation or economic effects.

An IT architect and entrepreneur sought NIW for work as a software engineer and architect. The petitioner claimed five of six exceptional ability criteria. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner did not meet the required three criteria for underlying EB-2 classification and therefore was ineligible for NIW consideration.

Automotive service technician seeks EB-2 NIW for process toolmaking and quality control in automotive manufacturing. AAO dismissed appeal on two independent grounds: deficient signature on appeal form, and lack of national importance of proposed endeavor under Dhanasar first prong.