Published AAO appeal decisions

Medical scientist in dentistry with advanced degree sought NIW for dental services, clinical research, and clinic management. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacked national importance and detailed research plan, limiting impact to patients and students rather than the broader field.

An anesthesiologist sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. Although qualified as advanced degree professional, the AAO summarily dismissed the appeal because petitioner failed to address the Director's findings on two dispositive Dhanasar prongs: national importance and balancing analysis, leaving these conclusions uncontested.

An international organization staff member requested second preference classification as an individual of exceptional ability with a national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding his salary criterion unmet because the pay reflected a standardized scale rather than exceptional ability. It therefore did not reach the waiver question.

General and operations manager sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification and NIW. AAO affirmed denial because petitioner failed to satisfy three of six exceptional ability regulatory criteria; NIW arguments not reached as dispositive basis for denial was established.

An operations representative claiming international expertise in security, risk analysis, and related fields sought national interest waiver for EB-2. The AAO dismissed because he did not qualify as an advanced degree professional or individual of exceptional ability; he did not meet three of six regulatory criteria for exceptional ability.

A postdoctoral researcher in geology and environmental science sought an EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO accepted advanced degree status but dismissed the appeal because the proposed endeavor was vague and inconsistent, so national importance was not shown under the first Dhanasar prong, and the other prongs were not reached.

Aerospace engineer seeks NIW for EB-2 to continue research on aerodynamic and automatic control systems. AAO found proposed research met Dhanasar prong one with national importance and broader field implications. However, petitioner failed prong two: insufficient evidence showed he was well positioned to advance research despite Ph.D., publications, and support letters. Appeal dismissed.

Entrepreneur in logistics sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification and national interest waiver. Director denied petition, finding petitioner satisfied only two of required three exceptional ability criteria. AAO upheld Director's determination that petitioner lacked full-time employment documentation for ten-year requirement and dismissed appeal; NIW issue rendered moot.

Emergency management specialist sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification and national interest waiver. Petitioner claimed four criteria but failed to meet three required. AAO found proposed work lacked national importance under Dhanasar, dismissing appeal without analyzing remaining NIW prongs.

Self-petitioner entrepreneur seeking NIW for real estate investment and consulting business. Claimed substantial merit and national importance under Dhanasar. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacks requisite national importance; work confined to petitioner's company and specific clientele without broader field or economic impact.

An actor and model requested second preference classification as an individual of exceptional ability with a national interest waiver. The Director found no exceptional ability criteria met. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding her academic record, license, and membership evidence insufficient, and declined to analyze the waiver because the threshold was unmet.

Electrical engineer seeks NIW for EB-2 based on advanced degree. Petitioner proposed research on computer network frameworks. AAO found proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance under Dhanasar prong one. However, AAO held petitioner failed prong two: insufficient evidence demonstrated he was well positioned to advance the research despite Ph.D., publications, and citations. Appeal dismissed.

Dance competitor and instructor sought exceptional ability classification and national interest waiver. AAO dismissed, finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance because competitive participation and instruction would not impact the field broadly, offer substantial job creation, or provide meaningful economic effects.

Systems engineer and project manager with advanced degree sought national interest waiver for EB-2 by claiming endeavor to close diversity gaps in STEM through educational programs. AAO found proposed work lacked sufficient prospective impact beyond specific students to meet national importance standard and thus failed first Dhanasar prong.

Sales and marketing officer seeks NIW and exceptional ability classification. AAO found he does not qualify as advanced degree professional and lacks three exceptional ability criteria. Appeal dismissed because proposed marketing work lacks demonstrated national importance.

An ophthalmology researcher with advanced degrees sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for continued research on retinal diseases and treatments. The AAO sustained appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs met: her research has substantial merit and national importance, she is well positioned to advance it, and her contributions benefit the United States.

Physics doctoral candidate seeking NIW for hypersonic technology research. AAO affirmed denial, finding proposed endeavor has national importance but applicant not well positioned to advance it. Master's degree and publications alone insufficient; lacked demonstrated role securing funding or generating field impact.

Nurse practitioner sought NIW for EB-2. Petitioner claimed national importance based on occupation's overall value and COVID-19 pandemic, plus conference attendance and multilingual background. AAO dismissed, finding benefit to individual patients and local conference attendance insufficient to establish national importance; endeavor must have broader implications beyond current employment.

A graduate student in architecture sought an EB-2 exceptional ability classification with a national interest waiver. The AAO held that the salary and recognition criteria were unmet, since scholarships were not shown to be remuneration or significant recognition. Without three criteria, waiver analysis was not reached and the appeal was dismissed.

Dentist and entrepreneur seeks NIW for dental implantology research and treatment. AAO held proposed endeavor lacks national importance because it benefits only the petitioner's patients and employer without broader implications for U.S. workforce or economy, thus denying NIW eligibility.

Software developer seeks NIW for web system design and development. AAO held while software development has substantial merit, work lacks national importance because it benefits only employer and its users without broader impact on IT field or U.S. economy through job creation or economic effects.

A geriatric nurse with an advanced degree sought national interest waiver of labor certification. She qualified for EB-2 advanced degree status but failed to establish national importance: her patient care, manuals, and lectures lacked documentary evidence of broader impact beyond her individual patients and facility.

A weightlifter with exceptional ability seeks NIW for EB-2. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to provide specific proposed endeavor at filing; general intent to work in weightlifting lacks national importance and substantial merit as required.

Physical therapist with advanced degree sought national interest waiver for a proposed Florida clinic offering physical therapy and fall prevention services. The AAO found the endeavor lacks national importance under Dhanasar; local employment projections and unquantified cost savings insufficient to demonstrate broader implications.

A supply chain manager sought NIW for EB-2 classification. The AAO held the proposed endeavor lacks national importance: assertions about Brazilian market trade and general supply chain management benefits do not demonstrate impact beyond the employer, and vague speculation about innovations without evidence of broader adoption or comparable responsibility elsewhere is insufficient.