Published AAO appeal decisions

Self-employed photographer sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO found petitioner met only one of six exceptional ability criteria (academic degree), failing to establish three required criteria. Because underlying EB-2 qualification not established, Dhanasar waiver analysis not reached.

Marketing manager sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner's inconsistent statements about the proposed endeavor prevented evaluation of its substantial merit or national importance under Dhanasar framework.

Senior project manager in business management claimed extraordinary ability under EB-1A. Petitioner met judging and high salary criteria but failed awards, membership, and original contributions criteria. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner satisfied only two of the required three alternate criteria and lacked sustained national or international acclaim.

An entrepreneur without demonstrated advanced degree equivalent sought EB-2 classification as general operations manager for soccer club or events business. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner failed to establish EB-2 eligibility and therefore could not qualify for NIW, without reaching Dhanasar prongs.

Sales representative with advanced degree seeks NIW. Petitioner resubmitted RFE response without addressing Director's grounds for denial. Appeal summarily dismissed under procedural rule because petitioner failed to identify specific erroneous conclusions of law or fact.

Human resources specialist sought NIW for EB-2 classification. She claimed her proposed HR consulting work had national importance via business plan and industry reports. AAO held the endeavor lacked national importance because her work would benefit only specific clients and employers, not the HR field or economy broadly.

A self-petitioner researcher in geospatial information management sought an NIW as an advanced degree professional. The AAO affirmed denial, finding she demonstrated substantial merit and was well-positioned but failed to establish the national importance of her proposed research as required by Dhanasar's first prong.

A nurse sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. The AAO affirmed that she lacked an advanced degree equivalent and failed to establish five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience. As she did not qualify for the underlying EB-2 classification, the Dhanasar analysis was not reached.

A pilot sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. The AAO found the petitioner failed to meet evidentiary criteria for exceptional ability or advanced degree professional status, lacking sufficient documentation from employers and relevant credentials, and therefore was ineligible for the underlying classification and waiver.

Vocational agricultural teacher sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Initial petition denied for failing to meet three of ten criteria; appeal dismissed. Motion to reopen and reconsider sought reconsideration without identifying legal error and submitted job offer dated after petition filing, which cannot establish eligibility retroactively. Motion dismissed.

An entrepreneur seeking EB-2 classification with national interest waiver claimed to work in oil and gas consulting. The AAO found the petitioner failed the first Dhanasar prong by providing vague, contradictory descriptions of the proposed endeavor without establishing its specific national importance.

Medical scientist seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver. Claimed proposed endeavor to bridge Korean and U.S. medical systems had substantial merit and national importance, and that he was well positioned to advance it. AAO found the endeavor lacked specificity, techniques were not clearly identified or proven superior to existing U.S. offerings, and no demonstrated partnerships or interest from relevant institutions.

A bassoonist claiming EB-1A extraordinary ability satisfied two of ten evidentiary criteria: judging and artistic exhibitions. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to demonstrate a third required criterion and lacked evidence of sustained national or international acclaim necessary for extraordinary ability classification.

Supply chain management specialist seeking EB-2 advanced degree with national interest waiver. Claimed supply chain expertise for pharmaceutical companies had national importance and he was well positioned to advance it. AAO found petitioner confused industry importance with specific endeavor importance; no evidence of impact beyond particular employers or substantial economic effects for nation.

A human resources manager sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver for consulting work through her company. AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor had substantial merit but lacked demonstrated national importance; insufficient evidence of potential to employ workers or produce substantial positive economic effects.

A pilot seeking EB-2 exceptional ability classification and NIW failed to submit required labor certification and did not clearly specify whether seeking classification as advanced degree professional or exceptional ability individual. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner did not establish EB-2 eligibility or merit for NIW under Dhanasar framework.

Athletic coach claimed three criteria for extraordinary ability in soccer coaching. Director found one criterion met. Petitioner on appeal reasserted awards and published material criteria. AAO held petitioner failed to establish awards were nationally recognized or that published material about him as coach appeared in major media, lacking required sustained acclaim.

An entrepreneur in supply chain management with an advanced degree seeking EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO found the petitioner qualified as advanced degree holder but failed the first Dhanasar prong. While the endeavor showed substantial merit, the petitioner lacked evidence of national importance beyond her own business operations.

Human resources manager with advanced degree seeks NIW for EB-2 classification to implement diversity and workplace safety initiatives in U.S. companies. AAO dismissed appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacked national importance despite substantial merit; general HR and safety work does not satisfy Dhanasar first prong.

A martial arts instructor seeks NIW for EB-2 as self-petitioner. AAO affirmed dismissal because petitioner failed to demonstrate exceptional ability required for EB-2 qualification; inconsistent representations about proposed endeavor made evaluation impossible; NIW analysis not reached.

Recording engineer and producer from Brazil claiming seven evidentiary criteria for EB-1A extraordinary ability. AAO found only published material criterion met, not the required three. Record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement at very top of field despite successful work with well-known artists.

An economist with master's degree in economics claims national interest waiver for educational consulting company bringing Nigerian students to U.S. universities. AAO found substantial merit but not national importance; endeavor too narrowly scoped to Nigerian students without broader field impact. Appeal dismissed.

Self-petitioning nail design artist claims extraordinary ability through international awards, published materials, judging participation, scholarly articles, and leadership role. AAO sustained appeal, finding petitioner demonstrated sustained international acclaim and expertise placing her among the small percentage at the very top of her field.

Assistant professor of finance seeks national interest waiver for EB-2 based on real estate research. Director found substantial merit but not national importance. AAO reversed, finding research on environmental, social, governance impacts and market solutions has national importance through academic dissemination. Petitioner meets all three Dhanasar prongs.

A tourism entrepreneur sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. The AAO affirmed she lacked an advanced degree equivalent and satisfied only one of six exceptional ability criteria. As she failed to qualify for underlying EB-2, the Dhanasar analysis was not reached.