Published AAO appeal decisions

Pilot self-petitioner sought NIW under EB-2 as advanced degree professional. AAO dismissed appeal, finding initial endeavor as airline transport pilot lacked national importance, and petitioner materially changed endeavor in response to RFE without establishing broader field implications.

CEO seeking NIW for eco-friendly manufacturing startup claimed national importance of his business venture. AAO held the endeavor lacks broader field-level impact, representing only routine company-specific benefit insufficient for NIW, distinguishing meaningful national importance from merely important work.

An economist sought extraordinary ability classification on reopened appeal after a finding that he submitted an altered paper naming him sole author. The AAO upheld the willful misrepresentation finding, concluded the evidentiary criteria and top-of-field standing were not shown, and dismissed the appeal without reaching continued work in the field.

Educational technology researcher claimed NIW for health literacy research advancing competency-based learning. AAO held proposed endeavor lacks demonstrated national importance despite university adoption at one institution, and applicant failed to show recent productivity or sustained research continuation warranting waiver.

A business process reengineering consultant sought a national interest waiver under the second preference category. After several earlier denials and dismissals, the petitioner filed a motion to reconsider. The AAO dismissed it because no incorrect application of law or policy was shown, and the arguments were repetitive or could have been raised earlier.

A tourism specialist and entrepreneur self-petitioned for EB-1A extraordinary ability. The AAO affirmed that the petitioner met fewer than three evidentiary criteria and did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability classification.

A business legal consultant appealed AAO dismissal on motion to reconsider, challenging criterion findings. The AAO dismissed the motion, holding petitioner met judging and scholarly articles criteria but failed final merits analysis, lacking sustained acclaim and elite field standing. Petitioner did not adequately address the dispositive final merits determination.

Tattoo artist with black-and-gray specialization sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Met four initial criteria including published material, judging, exhibitions, and remuneration. AAO found totality of evidence insufficient for sustained national or international acclaim required for small percentage at top of field. Appeal dismissed.

A materials engineering researcher proposed computational modeling research to improve additive manufacturing processes and sought a national interest waiver. The AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but held national importance was not shown, since the evidence did not demonstrate prospective impact. It dismissed the appeal and reserved the remaining prongs.

A sculptor with 20 years experience claimed five EB-1A criteria. The AAO found the service center's denial of three criteria conclusory and inadequately reasoned. The AAO confirmed one criterion was met and remanded for proper reconsideration of the other claimed criteria.

An entrepreneur sought EB-1A classification based on five claimed criteria. The AAO affirmed SCOPS findings that he met judging and leading role criteria but rejected published material due to missing author attribution, original contributions as lacking major significance, and high salary due to insufficient documentation. Appeal dismissed.

Industrial machinery mechanic sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with national interest waiver. AAO found petitioner met only two of six criteria and lacked exceptional ability: professional identity card did not constitute recognized profession license; salary evidence insufficient; professional association membership unsubstantiated; achievement recognition undemonstrated. Appeal dismissed.

Software engineer proposing AI infrastructure development for large language models advancing U.S. innovation seeks NIW under EB-2. AAO remanded because record was incomplete with illegible exhibits and SCOPS did not fully evaluate all three Dhanasar prongs. Petitioner to resubmit clear copies and articulate national importance and balance analysis.

Business management researcher self-petitioned for EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Claimed six criteria; AAO found four met but reversed SCOPS on two criteria (membership, published material), concluding threshold requirements unmet. Final merits determination reserved because initial evidence requirements not satisfied.

Oil and gas completions specialist seeks NIW under EB-2 with advanced degree. Proposed AI-enabled endeavor aligned with federal supply-chain policies. AAO dismissed appeal, finding substantial merit but no demonstrated national importance; company-specific savings lack broader industry implications required by Dhanasar.

A digital marketing specialist sought extraordinary ability classification. The service center found two criteria met; on appeal the petitioner claimed four more. The AAO found the threshold of three criteria satisfied but dismissed the appeal because the evidence did not show sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing.

A scientist seeks EB-2 classification with national interest waiver to conduct immunology research targeting autoimmune diseases and cancer. Service center denied the waiver based on inadequate national importance. AAO remanded because service center failed to properly analyze the proposed endeavor's specifics, the petitioner's qualifications, and factors favoring waiver.

Competitive swimmer seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Claimed awards, membership, published materials, and leading role criteria. AAO found awards met but membership and published materials not met; petitioner satisfied only two of ten criteria, below three-criterion threshold. Appeal dismissed.

An MMA fighter sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed motions to reopen and reconsider, affirming that while the petitioner met three initial criteria through awards, published material, and judging, the record did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the very top of the field.

Physicist sought EB-2 NIW for postdoctoral research and future academic positions in physics. AAO rejected SCOPS finding of national importance; petitioner's vague, undetermined research endeavor and few citations lack national or global implications in field. Appeal dismissed.

Legal consultant self-petitioned for EB-2 NIW to facilitate business transactions for U.S. investors entering Albanian market. AAO found substantial merit but no national importance because impact limited to individual clients without broader field implications. Appeal dismissed.

Business consultant in Brazil claimed six evidentiary criteria but met none of the three required. AAO found award not for excellence in field, SCORE membership insufficient, and company lacked distinguished reputation, declining final merits review.

Board-certified physician-scientist in rheumatology sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Claimed and met three evidentiary criteria: judging, scholarly articles, and leading/critical role. AAO dismissed appeal on final merits, finding insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim or elite standing in field.

Mathematics educator with 17 years teaching experience sought NIW for EB-2 classification. AAO affirmed SCOPS denial, finding the proposed endeavor lacked national importance because impacts were limited to her company and students without demonstrating broader field-level benefits or innovation.

A businessperson in Colombia seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO found petitioner failed to satisfy any of three claimed evidentiary criteria and could not meet the required minimum threshold of three criteria, so dismissed appeal.