Published AAO appeal decisions

Civil engineer proposing to found consulting services company in Massachusetts. Failed first Dhanasar prong on national importance; generic consulting for construction companies lacked national or global implications. Business plan contained numerous errors and unreliable financial projections. Appeal dismissed.

Equestrian trainer and coach self-petitioner could not use athlete achievements as prior acclaim had ended. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner met fewer than three initial evidentiary criteria and did not reach final merits.

Petitioner with advanced degree sought EB-2 NIW for project management consultancy using AI optimization. AAO dismissed appeal, finding substantial merit but not national importance. Petitioner conflated industry importance with endeavor-specific prospective impact and failed to demonstrate broader implications beyond her business.

Economist and former Armenian politician petitioned for EB-1A claiming eight criteria. AAO found three criteria met: published material, scholarly articles, and leading role at organizations. Case remanded for final merits analysis on whether evidence shows sustained acclaim among top percentile in field.

An IT systems engineer seeking EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver filed a self-petition. The AAO found the beneficiary qualified for EB-2 as an advanced degree professional but failed to establish national importance of his proposed endeavor. The vague business plan lacked evidence of significant employment creation or economic benefits at regional or national levels.

A visual artist sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The service center found one criterion met (exhibitions) but not three required. On appeal, the petitioner claimed awards, membership, published material, and leading role. The AAO rejected the awards claim, finding nominations insufficient and team awards lacking individual recognition. Only one criterion satisfied; threshold unmet; appeal dismissed.

A digital health communications influencer and public health educator sought EB-1A classification. The service center found two criteria met; the AAO on appeal reconsidered and found insufficient evidence for the high salary criterion, leaving petitioner below the three-criterion threshold.

An AI researcher with a Ph.D. in theoretical physics sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. She met initial evidence requirements in three criteria but failed the original contributions prong on closer review; citations alone were insufficient proof of major significance. The AAO found the record lacked evidence of sustained national or international acclaim required for the visa.

A digital transformation architect satisfied three initial criteria but failed the final merits test. AAO found his Salesforce certification, recent judging, publications, and employment did not demonstrate sustained acclaim or placement among the very top of the field required for extraordinary ability.

An aircraft mechanic sought EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver to develop aviation maintenance training programs. SCOPS found the endeavor had substantial merit but the AAO affirmed dismissal, holding the petitioner failed to establish national importance because the record lacked specifics on prospective impact and the expert letter addressed industry importance rather than the specific proposed endeavor's impact.

An entrepreneur planning a cybersecurity and crisis management company sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with a national interest waiver. The AAO found only the academic record criterion satisfied, withdrew the service center's findings on the other criteria, and reserved the waiver analysis, dismissing the appeal.

A mountaineer from Bangladesh sought EB-1A classification claiming awards, membership, publications, contributions, and leading role. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding insufficient evidence that awards were nationally or internationally recognized for excellence and that club membership required outstanding achievements by recognized experts. The petitioner did not demonstrate sustained acclaim at the top of the field.

Consultant with advanced degree proposing consulting and auditing services for small and medium businesses in financial compliance and governance. AAO held working in important industry insufficient; specific endeavor lacks demonstrated broader implications for field or economy.

Software development engineer in test claimed extraordinary ability under EB-1A, citing five criteria. AAO found he met judging and high salary criteria but abandoned other claims on appeal. Two criteria insufficient; record did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability classification.

Materials engineer seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver for supply chain optimization initiative. Petitioner holds advanced degree but failed to establish national importance of proposed endeavor; claimed scalability and broad impacts lack specific details and independent corroborating evidence.

Research engineer seeks NIW under EB-2 to conduct research in vehicle safety, renewable energy, and data centers. AAO dismissed, finding substantial merit but insufficient evidence of national importance; research activities limited to employer and clients without demonstrated broader implications.

An entrepreneur and inventor from Transnistria claimed extraordinary ability under EB-1A, asserting four evidentiary criteria. The AAO affirmed the Service Center's denial, finding he failed to demonstrate nationally or internationally recognized awards or judging experience, thus falling short of the required three criteria threshold.

Sales manager seeks national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. AAO withdrew service center decision and remanded for new decision because the original denial lacked sufficient analysis and explanation of how evidence failed to meet Dhanasar prongs; service center provided block quotations without explaining specific deficiencies.

A healthcare ethics and medical communication researcher in early-career stage seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner had not established sustained national or international acclaim or demonstrated career of acclaimed work required for extraordinary ability.

A supply and trade professional sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for maritime logistics work. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding his proposed endeavor lacked sufficient specificity regarding actual activities and failed to demonstrate national importance or broader implications beyond generalized objectives.

Mechanical engineer self-petitioner claimed five EB-1A criteria. SCOPS found only two met (judging, scholarly articles). AAO remanded because SCOPS misidentified awards, failed to explain published material issues, and confused patent citations with article citations, preventing proper evaluation of original contributions and final merits.

A poet sought EB-1A classification claiming seven criteria but successfully established only one. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding that lesser awards lacked national or international recognition, membership associations did not require outstanding achievements, and overall evidence showed only isolated accomplishments, not sustained acclaim required for extraordinary ability.

Founder and CEO of an AI platform company sought EB-1A classification. Petitioner claimed seven evidentiary criteria and sustained acclaim. AAO affirmed SCOPS finding that only judging criterion was met. Venture capital funding, fellowship participation, and other claims failed because they lacked necessary recognition or expert evaluation. Appeal dismissed.