AAO Decisions Explorer · Free
Published AAO appeal decisions
Search the decisions the Administrative Appeals Office has published, narrow them by visa, criterion, field and year, and read our summary of each one with a link to the official PDF.

Decisions in the library
6,586
6,586 classified
Visa types
3
Years covered
2005-2026
Latest decision
Aug 31, 2026
Filters
18 decisions
Outcomes in these results
- Dismissed
- Remanded
- Sustained
- O-1AArts, design, architectureMay 2025Dismissed
Dismissed · 4 criteria reviewed0 of 4 criteria metRead → - O-1AArts, design, architectureAug 2024Dismissed
A dance studio petitions for an O-1A visa for a dance instructor. The AAO found only one criterion met (published material) and rejected the judge criterion by withdrawing the service center's approval. It found original contributions insufficiently shown and determined the petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria.
1 of 5 criteria metRead → - O-1AArts, design, architectureAug 2024Dismissed
Dance studio petitioned for dance instructor beneficiary for O-1A classification. Service center found one criterion met. AAO affirmed that beneficiary met only one criterion and rejected original contributions claim based on lack of evidence of major significance. Petition dismissed as beneficiary failed to satisfy three-criterion requirement.
1 of 6 criteria metRead → - O-1AArts, design, architectureApr 2024Dismissed
Interior design business petitioned for senior interior designer O-1A nonimmigrant classification. AAO affirmed dismissal finding beneficiary met only published materials and recognition criteria; did not satisfy three-criterion threshold; petitioner also lacked valid U.S. employer status.
1 of 9 criteria metRead → - O-1AArts, design, architectureMar 2024Dismissed
A talent agency petitioned for O-1A classification of a photographer claiming extraordinary ability. The applicant failed to meet the evidentiary criteria: published material lacked proper documentation and major publication status, and critical recognition letters came from non-photography experts. The appeal was dismissed.
0 of 7 criteria metRead → - O-1AArts, design, architectureOct 2023Dismissed
Dismissed · 8 criteria reviewed0 of 8 criteria metRead → - O-1AArts, design, architectureJan 2022Dismissed
An artist agent, who is also a professor of studio arts, petitioned for a fine artist under the O-1 classification for extraordinary ability in the arts. This is O-1B, not O-1A. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the evidence did not satisfy three of the alternative regulatory criteria.
Read → - O-1AArts, design, architecture2021Dismissed
Dismissed · 4 criteria reviewed1 of 4 criteria metRead → - O-1AArts, design, architectureSep 2020Dismissed
An agent petitioned to extend O-1A status for a fashion designer beneficiary. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the beneficiary failed to satisfy initial evidentiary criteria. Two criteria were analyzed and rejected (lead role and commercial success), while two additional criteria claimed on appeal were reserved as unnecessary to the decision.
0 of 6 criteria metRead → - O-1AArts, design, architectureFeb 2020Dismissed
An architectural designer employed by a real estate development company sought O-1A classification. Petitioner claimed eight criteria but only met two. AAO found published materials insufficient, lead role claim unsupported by evidence that beneficiary merely interned, and testimonials from colleagues lacked demonstrated recognition outside that circle. Appeal dismissed.
1 of 8 criteria metRead → - O-1AArts, design, architecture2019Dismissed
Dismissed · 9 criteria reviewed1 of 9 criteria metRead → - O-1AArts, design, architecture2018Dismissed
Dismissed · 5 criteria reviewed2 of 5 criteria metRead → - O-1AArts, design, architecture2018Dismissed
A symphony orchestra petitioned to employ a pianist as O-1A nonimmigrant. The petitioner claimed extraordinary ability through awards, lead performer status, published recognition, and commercial success. The AAO found the petitioner failed to demonstrate a significant national or international award and satisfied none of four claimed evidentiary criteria, dismissing the appeal.
0 of 4 criteria metRead → - O-1AArts, design, architecture2017Dismissed
Dismissed · 4 criteria reviewed0 of 4 criteria metRead → - O-1AArts, design, architecture2017Dismissed
A car restoration company sponsored a Brazilian restoration designer and fabricator for O-1A visa. Director found one criterion met (significant recognition). Petitioner claimed five others on appeal. AAO found none met: no evidence of future lead role, no national recognition in major publications, no commercial success, and prospective salary not demonstrably high for the field.
0 of 5 criteria metRead → - O-1AArts, design, architecture2017Dismissed
An agent petitions for a professional photographer from Argentina seeking O-1A classification. Petitioner presented articles, testimonials, and work history as photographer. AAO found evidence failed to satisfy required evidentiary criteria: no significant award, no published recognition of individual achievements, no demonstrated lead role at distinguished organizations.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - O-1AArts, design, architecture2016Dismissed
A sculptor seeks O-1A visa. The decision affirms dismissal of the appeal on a motion to reconsider, finding the petitioner failed to meet evidentiary criteria for awards or critical roles, did not submit qualifying comparable evidence, and provided insufficient detail about employment terms and scheduled activities.
0 of 2 criteria metRead → - O-1AArts, design, architecture2016Dismissed
An art studio/gallery petitioned for an artist beneficiary for O-1A classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the beneficiary was neither nominated for nor received a qualifying award, and satisfied fewer than three of the six required criteria, failing to demonstrate extraordinary ability in the arts.
0 of 8 criteria metRead →
