Published AAO appeal decisions

Conflict resolution consultant with master's degree in global development and peace seeks NIW. AAO dismissed appeal because proposed endeavor, though with substantial merit, lacks sufficient evidence of broader field impact and qualitative significance required for national importance under Dhanasar.

Lawyer seeking EB-2 advanced degree classification and national interest waiver to establish legal consultancy for sustainable energy. Claimed substantial merit and national importance for Center for Legal Innovation in Sustainable Energy but failed to demonstrate national importance or specific improvements over existing initiatives. AAO dismissed appeal; first and third prongs not established.

Senior legal advisor with advanced degree sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Service center denied without analyzing evidence against Dhanasar framework. AAO remanded because service center failed to discuss evidence, identify insufficiencies, or explain conclusions for any of the three prongs required for meaningful appellate review.

Advanced degree professional in human trafficking prevention seeking EB-2 national interest waiver. Petitioner established substantial merit but failed to demonstrate national importance of specific proposed endeavor. While human trafficking prevention is federally recognized as priority, petitioner's individual work lacks evidence of prospective national or global impact beyond immediate clients. Appeal dismissed.

Military chaplain with advanced degree sought NIW for proposed endeavor addressing servicemember suicide and extremism. AAO affirmed dismissal because the endeavor lacks national importance; impact confined to individuals receiving services, not the broader field or national interest.

A journalist with a master's degree sought EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver to establish an institute on U.S.-European relations and countering disinformation. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner failed to meet the third Dhanasar prong: while U.S. would benefit from contributions, the petitioner did not show impracticality of securing a job offer, labor certification, or sufficient urgency.