Published AAO appeal decisions

Entrepreneur seeks NIW for EB-2 classification to operate business consulting and professional development company. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance despite alignment with federal programs; focus on specific undertaking rather than general business importance is determinative.

Mechanical engineer from Brazil proposing industrial maintenance services, consulting, and workforce training business seeking EB-2 NIW. AAO found petitioner lacked five years progressive experience for advanced degree professional basis. On merits, proposed endeavor lacks sufficient documentary evidence of national importance; workforce shortage alone insufficient; no showing of significant employment or regional economic benefit.

A software developer with advanced degree claims NIW for low-code platform development work. AAO affirmed SCOPS' denial, finding the endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance, as supporting letters conflate field importance with specific endeavor impact and job creation claims lack corroboration.

Semiconductor engineer with advanced degree in physics seeks EB-2 national interest waiver. Proposed developing semiconductor chips for telecommunications and computing. AAO found endeavor aligned with industry priorities but lacked demonstrated substantial national importance beyond incremental contributions. Appeal dismissed.

Research and development manager in software engineering from China working on machine learning for insurance industry risk assessment. Met first Dhanasar prong on substantial merit and national importance but failed second prong; citations and education alone insufficient to demonstrate well-positioned status. Appeal dismissed.

A forecasting and data analysis researcher sought a national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. The AAO dismissed, finding the first Dhanasar prong met but the second and third prongs unmet: insufficient evidence of being well-positioned to advance the endeavor and that a waiver would benefit the United States.

A Ph.D. student in informatics sought NIW for EB-2 classification with advanced degree. The AAO dismissed appeal after finding the proposed AI research endeavor lacks national importance. Field importance and STEM or critical emerging technology status alone do not establish specific endeavor's national importance.

Computer scientist with Ph.D. in computer and information engineering seeks NIW for EB-2 to conduct machine learning and optimization research. AAO sustained appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs satisfied because SCOPS misconstrued proposed endeavor and undervalued contributions to critical STEM technology advancement.

Ph.D. student in molecular biology proposes cancer research on environmental, molecular, and genetic disease mechanisms. AAO found proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance but dismissed appeal because petitioner insufficient evidence of prior success or progress to show capacity to advance the proposed research.

A civil engineer sought NIW for advanced-degree EB-2, proposing a scaffolding and shoring equipment business in Florida. The AAO dismissed the appeal, agreeing the endeavor had substantial merit but finding insufficient evidence that the specific endeavor would have national importance beyond local impact or economic significance.

Electrical engineer sought EB-2 NIW. AAO withdrew SCOPS denial and remanded. Petitioner established substantial merit and national importance of proposed research and that he is well positioned to advance it through education, experience, and expert support. SCOPS must reconsider whether balancing factors favor waiving job offer requirement.

Formulation scientist with Ph.D. seeks NIW for drug delivery systems research. AAO found substantial merit and national importance of proposed research endeavor but concluded petitioner failed to demonstrate independence from employer, failing second prong.

Machine learning engineer with PhD in electrical and computer engineering seeks NIW for EB-2 employment-based classification. Proposed research in safe and fair AI algorithms for autonomous and recommendation systems. AAO found research had national importance but petitioner lacked demonstrated position, track record, and plan to advance the specific endeavor; appeal dismissed.

Humanitarian nonprofit petitions for HR manager beneficiary for EB-2 with NIW. Beneficiary holds advanced degree and employer established EB-2 eligibility. AAO dismissed, finding proposed endeavor lacked sufficient national importance to satisfy first Dhanasar prong.

An employer petitioned for an EB-2 national interest waiver for a machine learning engineer developing deep learning and NLP models. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner established substantial merit but failed to demonstrate that the specific proposed endeavor had national importance despite evidence of AI field importance.

Advanced degree professional sought EB-2 national interest waiver. Petitioner reargued facts and legal claims already considered on appeal and two prior motions without citing new precedent or showing incorrect application of law. Motion to reconsider dismissed; underlying petition remains denied.

Business analyst and trade consultant seeks EB-2 classification with national interest waiver for data analytics platform targeting maritime security and trade transparency. AAO affirmed that proposed endeavor lacks national importance and petitioner is not well positioned to advance it; insufficient evidence of economic or security impact.

A digital marketing company sponsors a data scientist for EB-2 with national interest waiver. The AAO found the beneficiary qualified for EB-2 with an advanced degree and the endeavor has substantial merit, but rejected the waiver because the petitioner failed to demonstrate the proposed work has national importance, only that STEM fields are important generally.

A senior SoC researcher sought EB-2 NIW under Dhanasar. The AAO found substantial merit and national importance of his hardware security research but held he failed to show he is well-positioned to advance it, lacking contemporaneous evidence of impact or specific advancement plan.

Computer scientist with advanced degree proposed developing computer vision and large language models for drug discovery. AAO found SCOPS failed to adequately analyze whether endeavor has substantial merit and national importance, contained contradictory statements on second prong, and insufficiently analyzed third prong. Decision withdrawn and remanded.

A research and development engineer in textile materials science sought a national interest waiver for work on durable protective textiles. The AAO agreed the endeavor has merit and national importance but dismissed the appeal because education, publications, citations and letters did not show he was well positioned to advance it; the balancing prong was reserved.

Senior manager of data science with Ph.D. in biostatistics sought EB-2 NIW to develop multivariate temporal models using AI for gene regulatory networks and socioeconomic systems. AAO found proposed research has national importance but petitioner's employment role only benefits employer, not the nation; petitioner not well positioned to advance endeavor.

Senior machine learning engineer proposes research on foundational model disentanglement and interpretability. AAO found the endeavor has substantial merit and national importance but rejected the petition because the petitioner failed to demonstrate she is well-positioned to advance it through sufficient record of success or influence in the field.

Senior software engineer with PhD in computer science proposes distributed query optimization research. AAO found the research endeavor meritorious but distinguished between proposed independent research and employer-specific benefits, finding the latter lacks national importance. Petition dismissed because petitioner failed second prong.

Entrepreneur seeks national interest waiver for EB-2 classification but lacks required advanced degree or proven exceptional ability. AAO held she failed to establish advanced degree eligibility and that her proposed endeavor lacks national importance; serves underserved clients but lacks broader field impact, accomplishments, or demonstrated track record.